I don't think people were complaining about it being busy in itself, but rather that a small area was crowded because essentially they thought it would be bigger.
Yes, Universal have stated it was 20 acres. Do you know how big 20 acres is? I don't, apart from it sounds big.
Put in to context, this 'World' was touted as a "Theme park within a theme park" from the very
outset - a phrase that has been bantered around continually ever since. And no, granted, that's the BBC not Universal who said that...but in 2007 when the project was officially announced where do you think the BBC (and many other sites) got their spiel from if not Universal PR.
Hype that was continued by the
Orlando Sentinel "The collection of rides, shops and eateries being built in Universal's Islands of Adventure is the most hotly anticipated addition to Orlando's theme parks since Disney's Animal Kingdom opened at Walt Disney World in 1998."
Sure, it says it's within IoA but it also makes a direct comparison to DAK -
an entire Disney park - really. Really? Now if you've never been to Universal Studios before what kind of impression is that going to leave you with? Again, this is before anyone from the press had seen WWoHP so where did they get this from if not Universal.
Even right up till yesterday,
Associated Press finished their piece with "Admission to Wizarding World is included with ticket for Islands of Adventure." implying that it's an additional attraction that you're getting free entry to with an IOA ticket - you don't see anyone saying 'Admission to Fantasyland is included with entry into the MK', and rightly so.
It's easy to say 'oh it should be obvious' when you're familiar with Universal, or even Orlando attractions, but for people who are visiting the first time ever - and this is bringing in a whole new visitor base with Harry Potter fanbase - then I can see why it would come as a shock.
You're basically saying that internet forums should be required reading for a family holiday which I feel is asking a lot of the average person. This isn't some backwater B&B you're looking for reviews on but a respectable themepark franchise, it's not unreasonable for people to come to a conclusion about the scale of WWoHP and really who can blame them for that.
If you see an advert in the paper for the brand new 'super spintastical Washomatic' washing machine and trot down Curry's to buy it then sure, if you'd read that well respected washing machine forum you could have got a free box of washing powder if only you'd known. No one should walk away with tumble dryer though.
Now, don't get me wrong - I'm not here to play devil's advocate or anything, I'm just genuinely surprised that no one's actually disagreed that Universal hasn't been stretching the truth a wee bit, but instead basically said 'well it's their own fault for believing it'. Now sure, some (or possibly a lot) of people might have been a little bit gullible but since when does that make them the guilty party and not the victim?
