Nemo Lawsuit Failed

[Galahad]

This might have been posted before, but if not:

Frenchman loses Nemo copy claim
A French children's book author who claimed Disney's Finding Nemo copied a fish of his creation has been convicted of fraud and ordered to pay damages.
Franck Le Calvez claimed that the film's title character was based on his orange and white clown fish, Pierrot.

But a French court ruled on Wednesday that Nemo had existed before Pierrot and that Le Calvez even knew of the Disney character when he created his.

He was ordered to pay 61,000 euros ($80,000, £42,000) damages and costs.

Le Calvez had already lost one case last March. A court ruled then that the two fish were similar - both have big smiles and sport three stripes down the side - but found that their similarities were not enough to confuse people.

Already drawn

The French writer maintained that the Walt Disney Company copied his character and launched a separate action for damages of 1 million euros.

He argued that Nemo's creators copied his character and story, Pierrot the Clown Fish, about a young fish separated from his family - a plot similar to that of Finding Nemo.

Le Calvez published his book in late 2002, though he had claimed that the story was registered years before.

The court ruled that Nemo could be seen in France by mid-2002 through internet sites and in film previews available on video cassettes for other Disney films released from September onwards.

Disney lawyer Magali Thorne said the US fish was already drawn by 2000.

'Very happy'

The court ruled that Le Calvez had knowledge of the Disney character and had fraudulent intentions when he registered his own brand.

Outside court, Ms Thorne said Disney was "very, very, very happy" with the ruling.

Le Calvez was ordered to pay a total of 38,000 euros in damages to Disney and Pixar Animation - which together own Nemo - and to French publisher Disney-Hachette Editions.

He was also ordered to reimburse legal fees of 23,000 euros to the three companies and to pay the cost of advertising the ruling.

Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/entertainment/4466533.stm

Published: 2005/04/20 20:59:07 GMT

© BBC MMV

 

[DancingBear]

Sometimes, the system works.

 

[Plus4206]

I'm glad the case was settled the way it was, but can someone explain to me why Disney was in court and not Pixar - the people who actually made the film and created Nemo ?

 

[Galahad]

I'm glad the case was settled the way it was, but can someone explain to me why Disney was in court and not Pixar - the people who actually made the film and created Nemo ?

I'm sure that creation and ownership are two different things. I would guess that Disney has a significant copyright interest in all of the movies it has participated in with Pixar.