Hi - Here's the deal. My two nephews (almost 8 and in 2nd grade and almost 6 and in K) are, I believe, way high on the IQ scale. The 8 year old has been pulled out of his class this year for Math - and has almost completed the 3rd grade curriculum. Well, that setup was put in place at the end of last year - this year there is a new principal. Dsis and Dbil were told that next year they are going to stop the practice of 'pulling out' of classes and, instead, dnephew will be staying in his 3rd grade class and (this part I love) doing 3rd grade math AGAIN! Of course, the principal made it sound better - they have a 'new' math program where they will learn the same concepts but in different ways AND (again I love this) they have some online programs available to further challenge the kids. UMmmm...if they wanted him to learn from a computer they would have him in online school. Basically they said that the ONLY option is for his teacher next year is to teach by differentiation. Which, by the way - his teacher this year has SAID the words several times that she 'doesn't know what to do with nephew' and his skills.
So, my question, isn't it a law or something that they HAVE to provide my nephew with some sort of actual Math education next year? Instead of just learning all the same things again? Is it truly feasible that a teacher will be able to teach a year of 3rd grade math AND a year of 4th grade math to kids in the same classroom?
Oh - and the worst part is that the struggle is just beginning with this principal. Dnephew(5) is way more advanced than his big brother. He has been multiplying since before K started!!!
I told dsis that after her meeting with principal that she should write a follow-up letter and ask for an acceptable plan and if it isn't provided, she would go to the school board to ask that the district 'guidelines' be updated. Is this the right way to go next?
They're not asking for much - there is a 4th grade classroom right down the hall. They just want him to be in that classroom for Math instead of the 3rd grade one.
Thoughts??
So, my question, isn't it a law or something that they HAVE to provide my nephew with some sort of actual Math education next year? Instead of just learning all the same things again? Is it truly feasible that a teacher will be able to teach a year of 3rd grade math AND a year of 4th grade math to kids in the same classroom?
Oh - and the worst part is that the struggle is just beginning with this principal. Dnephew(5) is way more advanced than his big brother. He has been multiplying since before K started!!!
I told dsis that after her meeting with principal that she should write a follow-up letter and ask for an acceptable plan and if it isn't provided, she would go to the school board to ask that the district 'guidelines' be updated. Is this the right way to go next?
They're not asking for much - there is a 4th grade classroom right down the hall. They just want him to be in that classroom for Math instead of the 3rd grade one.
Thoughts??


. IEPs are for students with disabilities. The correct terminology for the plan for gifted students in NC is DEP (differentiated education plan). However, the above posters are correct in that each state has their own laws and your SIL should check to find out what the requirements are for her state.
And I STILL think they're the best!
.