BikeFan said:
WillCAD:
Some comments and questions; first, thanks for starting this topic. It's a great idea.
Second, what photo editor do you use? (Haven't read all the thread yet, so maybe you mentioned it already; if so, sorry).
Finally, I found your advice re getting several smaller memory cards instead of a single large one to be interesting, but I'm not sure I agree. Is sudden failure of digital media really that much of an issue (outside of user error, which is impossible to predict)? Do you think this outweighs the 'hassle factor' of dealing with several smaller cards? I've got a 512MB card for my Canon S400, and I just love the fact I can off-load the card before vacation and not have to worry about changing it/clearing it/etc. at all during my trip. But of course if that card were to fail . . ., well, no more pictures!
I use Corel PhotoPaint as my photo editor; it is one of the components of the CorelkDraw grasphics suite and is basically Corel's product designed to do what Photoshop does (though I think the interface is way easier for novices to understand).
As to digital media, sudden failure is not the real issue, although it certainly does happen, every day, to lots and lots of people. The real issues are the external problems: water, impacts, camera error, camera loss, camera theft, accidental erasure of all pics because the operator pressed the wrong button, accidental formatting of the card because the operator pressed the wrong button, magnetic fields from electrical devices causing data disruption, and the old stand-by of bad sectors.
It's not so much that a media card is an unreliable device as it is that the field environment in which they are used is dangerous and can damage them - or cause them to be lost.
Even if the cards were 100% reliable, which they are not, there is still the very real possibility of the operator pressing a button (or actually, a sequence of buttons) that causes him to erase all the pics on the card accidentally. This is the number one danger to digital pics and happens with alarming frequency.
The number two danger is a broken camera damaging the card or damaging the data (pics) on the card. Drop your camera on concrete or into a fountain, and you might just find that along with your $300 Kodak you have lost all the pics on the card.
And number three is simple loss of the camera. Let's face it, cameras get left behind in restaurants, on walls and planters, on benches and tables, every day, and they also get stolen every day. And as goes your camera, so goes your memory card - and all the pics on it.
As to the "hassle" factor, I don't consider carrying a 1"x1"x1/8" wafer, which weighs about the same as my house key,around all day in my pocket, to be any form of "hassle", or "bother" or "trouble" at all. But then again, I have never complained about the "hassle" of carrying both a room key card AND a park pass card at the same time instead of having them both on one card - Oh! The Humanity! Those cards are so heavy, and I thought vacation was supposed to be fun... well, you get the idea.
When you look objectively at this issue, the probablility that SOMETHING will eventually happen to your camera, whether it's caused by you, another vacationer, a sneak thief, or the Great Spirit, is almost 100%. Everybody eventually has something go wrong, and all you need to ask yourself is, "When it goes horribly, horribly wrong, would I rather lose ALL of my pics, or SOME of my pics?"
I choose "Some." I have multiple cards and am happier for it.