morethananyonex
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2009
- Messages
- 2,871
Might as well park at DTD and save the parking fees
. After all, the ride to the TTC seems just as brutal as the DTD bus rides at this point 


Believe me Rusty would be the first to call it as it is, he does not ever buy the company line.
If he says it is maintenance then I would believe it.
Actually, my exact wording was ~ and I quote
So, no, I didn't say "no one".
For those that are concerned and those that have felt the pain of having to take a ferry after 10:30pm recently, I have two things to say to you. 1st, I hope ALL of you are writing Disney like the OP with your complaints, suggestions and concerns. 2nd, especially for those who have already been there or plan on going soon. I highly suggest you record and post to youtube your experience trying to catch the ferry. If it is as dangerous and concerning as many have said, the videos should speak for itself, as soon as they spread a bit, the PR nightmare for Disney will settle in. Unfortunately, the one thing that can get a Company to act in these situations, is the threat of bad PR.
Why don't they not run them until 10 in the morning or something? Run buses in the morning rather than at night. Crowds are more spread out for arriving in the morning than everyone leaving at the same time at night. Plus no cranky kids waiting for the boat.
It's a good thing they're not called Monorail Resorts then. They're actually called Deluxe Resorts.
Just wrote my email to guest services.
When I was there last week there was an employee loyalty party or something along those lines at the Magic Kingdom. The monorail closed at 7:30........
Definitely takes away from the Magic of staying at Bay Lake Tower, but doesn't take anything out of the price.
Here's a post that I've created with help of a friend of mine to hopefully help outline and further clarify the MK transportation options :]
http://www.disboards.com/showthread.php?t=2803520
That was a huge help! Thanks!!![]()
If it really is a maintenance issue, why not defer to the fall/winter season when the parks close much earlier anyway, rather than almost in the middle of the summer season?
Or purchase one, just one, additional monorail train and rotate others out of service each day for maintenance?
If it was a cost saving measure, certainly it costs more to operate multiple diesel buses, pay multiple drivers, and increase maintenance costs on multiple buses than it does an electric train with one driver?
Unless you really didn't increase transport capacity to replace that lost by closing the monorail?
Who knows what the real reason is. What's important is that Disney's response is stupid. Plain and simple stupid.
They lost $2400 from me when I switched my December reservation from the CR to the CSR, a decision spurred primarily by this monorail issue. If I'm going to pay a premium to stay at a monorail resort, then I expect the monorail to be operating as long as there are other significant things for me to do and get back and forth from.
So they didn't save a dime in that respect.
So you really buy into this maintenance story.![]()
1. They shouldn't have let it get this bad.1) People, maintenance is maintenance.
. . . Would you rather be stuck on the monorail in a breakdown?
. . . Would you rather the monorail be down during the day?
. . . Would you rather a major breakdown and 2-3 days down?
2) Let them do the maintenance.
3) There are other ways back to the resort.
4) You are on vacation, so what is the rush? *
* And, no, sleeping/crabby children is not an excuse. If they are
that tired, you should have left hours ago. IMHO
1) Yes.
2) OK, there may well be some labor savings.
3) But, beam work takes a while.
4) Especially if there are concrete patches or electrical buss work.
5) As a previous CEO, I know that maintenance work takes a while.
6) In most cases, far longer than most people would estimate.
NOTE: Of course, it does not hurt to have a WDW electrician live
two houses from me. Over (quite a few) beers, we have talked about
the buss issues on the monorail. They have not been addressed for a
long time, due to the time it takes vs available "down" hours.
I'm no engineer/electrician/whatever, but wouldn't it have been more logical to start maintaining the beams much sooner therefore having to cut hours at inconvenient times less? If they had started this years ago utilizing downtime that already existed wouldn't they be in a much better position then they are now?
It does scare me that they've been operating on (what I consider to be) thin safety margins for so long on this system, but I'm glad they're doing something about it now, even if it gives them a public black eye for a while. Better that than a tragedy later. Lambast them all you like for poor decision-making, but I applaud them being responsible, even if they're late in doing so.