I agree, technology has made the population more aware of the dangers of the world. However, the world has grown by 3 billion people in approx. 30 yrs. so the risks of these encounters has grown as well. The abundance of people allows for more crimes to occur, more accidents to occur, more diagnosis of autism to occur, ect. There were many killers back in the mid 1900's just as there are killers today, but I agree the easy access of the media has made it far more easily to obtain the information. I actually just read an article about the number one threat to children right now, and it is internet predators. Why go through the trouble of strolling playgrounds and parks when perpetrators can access the children easily online.
First, do you have children? Apparently there are those that think your opinion only matters if you do. I'm just kidding of course.
I have had this discussion with people also and we aren't all that sure that the world really is less safe. I think a lot of the things we hear about happened 20+ years ago, it was just not as easy to find out because the world was smaller and news traveled slower. For example, I don't think that more kids are molested or abused today than 20 years ago. We just know much more about what happens than we did 20 years ago. Yes, the Internet is new, but the Internet is merely a medium. The same people that troll chat rooms for children used to troll shopping malls or playgrounds. There are real dangers in the world for children, and children should be taught to be prepared and to be able to recognize them. I am in the technology field and a very common area of discussion is the difference between the real threats to children online and the ones that non tech savvy parents think the threat is, but that is a whole new threat.
I am not delusional enough to think there aren't dangers, but there is a difference between a child molester and another kid that pantses you in the hall way. There is a difference between the kid that hugs another kid in kindergarten and the adult that hugs a child in an inappropriate way. There is a difference in the positive attention of a mentor and the exploitation of trust by someone in power. If the child is prepared to critically think for themselves even a first grader can distinguish the difference.
I don't have kids, and I don't agree with you.![]()
Perhaps the helmet was a bad example, I still wouldn't require one for my children, but I would respect your decision to have your kids wear them. I am 100% for the liberty to decide what is best for you. My brother doesn't require my nephew to wear a helmet and only one of my friends with kids require theirs to wear one.
Nope, no kids. I was however a kid and I was pantsed on multiple occasions. Somehow I managed to grow to be a productive member of society despite the horrible abuse I sufferd.
As far as helmets go, I was also a kid and not one single solitary person I grew up with wore one. Not one. Yet somehow we all manged to grow to be adults. The human species didn't cease to exists in the late 80's because we didn't wear helmets. Our family did weekly outings to the local parks and road the trails helmet-less. My parents and brothers included, yet we are all still breathing. I cycle often and of course when I'm on the roads doing 30 or 40 miles an hour on the road bike training I wear one. I don't if I am on my slower bikes and not on main roads.
That was just the example I used to go along with the whole over reaction by adults in society. I'm not that old, I didn't grow up in the 50's but we were allowed to be kids. We were allowed to do childish pranks, like pantsing someone, without it turning into parent conference time. We were allowed out after dark and on our own, provided it wasn't a school night. When we played sports there were winners and losers, only the winners got the trophy. We weren't cottled and taught that everyone is a winner. No, there are also losers. That is how life is. The guy (or lady) that hits their goals at work are not treated the same, normally, as the other guy that never meets quotas. There are winners and losers in the real world.
It is just a general trend I see with not allowing kids to actually go out and discover the world and themselves on their own. Being embarrassed from time to time is good, it teaches you humility. It is part of like like being hurt, being disappointed, being let down. Learning to deal with those things are just as important as learning to deal with happiness, joy, and accomplishment. It is merely my opinion, it is neither right nor wrong, as opinions go.
Perhaps the helmet was a bad example, I still wouldn't require one for my children, but I would respect your decision to have your kids wear them. I am 100% for the liberty to decide what is best for you. My brother doesn't require my nephew to wear a helmet and only one of my friends with kids require theirs to wear one. .
WOW! I can't believe how many people here I saying this happened all the time when they were growing up. REALLY? Kids had their pants pulled down, underwear and all??
I don't know what rock I have been living under all these years, but I have never heard of anything like that happening in the schools that I went to, and I definitley was never a witness to it.
Now, I DO remember my 1st grade teacher calling a boy to the front of the room, pulling his pants down to his bare bum, and whacking him with a ruler as we all watched. I have never forgotten that. She was pretty old, and didn't lose her job, so I am thinking it must have been before corporal punishment became illegal.
To the OP, I am so sorry for your little girlThat is just plain horrible
Truthfully, I am HORRIFIED that some of the supposed "adults" on this board are so blasé about something so blatantly wrong and utterly hurtful. I cringe to think of my child going to school with other children who have parents with that type of attitude.
You said it perfectly![]()
So now being pantsed is sexual harassment
This happened many a time growing up, it was just something that kids did. Someone pantsed someone else at or end of year softball party a month ago. When I was in school it was mostly a boy thing. It would get a scolding and nothing more.
There is a difference between inappropriateness and kids being kids. I'd chalk this up with making kids wear helmets every time they ride their bike, being over protective.
Just my opinion.
While I agree with you up to a point, I can't agree 100%. I grew up driving, and riding in a car, without seatbelts. So..is it overprotective that we now have them? Don't think so. I also grew up riding my bike, for miles every day, without a helmet. And I also grew up to be an adult with no lasting issues.That is irrelevant. Seeing as I was a child I know what it was like. I wouldn't change anything, including the embarrassing things that happened, they all shape you into what you become. Someone I manged to grow to be a functional, tax paying, college educated, employed member of society.
Either way. The former was probably the intention, the later the result. Just kids being kids. If anyone of any age complained to me about being pantsed I'd say suck it up, it isn't going to kill you.
Nope, no kids. I was however a kid and I was pantsed on multiple occasions. Somehow I managed to grow to be a productive member of society despite the horrible abuse I sufferd.
As far as helmets go, I was also a kid and not one single solitary person I grew up with wore one. Not one. Yet somehow we all manged to grow to be adults. The human species didn't cease to exists in the late 80's because we didn't wear helmets. Our family did weekly outings to the local parks and road the trails helmet-less. My parents and brothers included, yet we are all still breathing. I cycle often and of course when I'm on the roads doing 30 or 40 miles an hour on the road bike training I wear one. I don't if I am on my slower bikes and not on main roads.
That was just the example I used to go along with the whole over reaction by adults in society. I'm not that old, I didn't grow up in the 50's but we were allowed to be kids. We were allowed to do childish pranks, like pantsing someone, without it turning into parent conference time. We were allowed out after dark and on our own, provided it wasn't a school night. When we played sports there were winners and losers, only the winners got the trophy. We weren't cottled and taught that everyone is a winner. No, there are also losers. That is how life is. The guy (or lady) that hits their goals at work are not treated the same, normally, as the other guy that never meets quotas. There are winners and losers in the real world.
It is just a general trend I see with not allowing kids to actually go out and discover the world and themselves on their own. Being embarrassed from time to time is good, it teaches you humility. It is part of like like being hurt, being disappointed, being let down. Learning to deal with those things are just as important as learning to deal with happiness, joy, and accomplishment. It is merely my opinion, it is neither right nor wrong, as opinions go.
( I don't have kids so I guess my opinion will be without much consideration.jk just jk)
I was reading this and felt so bad for your daughter. I read your first post and that you had asked that your daughters not be in the class with the other girl and that it was ignored.This little girl was the one who left a welt on one of your daughter's back? I am sorry, but that is outrageous! I think you need to go to the school and have a little talk with the principal to get your daughters or the other child out of that class.
Bullying is not ok in any shape or form and I think it needs to be dealt with.