Ok, I took a day off from the Attractions and Strategies forum to give you all a break

.
In reading some of what I missed,

to brunette.
The cutback vs change "debate" is utter silliness, but in writing a longer bit on this, I think I see the issue here.
Most of us are seeing this from a monorail service perspective. This service is being reduced, hence the cutback label. Kaytiee (If I flubbed the spelling I'll edit) is looking it from an overall transportation perspective, hence just a change of state.
I don't think many of us are concerned about being stranded in general, so what's at issue is actually the monorail service cutback and not worried about transportation as a whole (and by "us" I mean other people, as it's not likely to affect me this year at all

). They are placing higher value (for their own vacations) on the monorail than on a bus, and hence when the monorail is taken away and replaced with a bus, they are getting less value for the same cost. This is the consumer-side of a cutback in general.
Then again, I could be wrong

, but I just don't think I am!
(As a note, I skipped a bunch between pgs 145 and 151. Deal with it

)