maiapapaya
Totally DIS-tracted!
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2009
- Messages
- 2,802
Original intent? So we need to go back to 1971? In last week's Allearsnet newsletter, they discussed the opening of the MK and in particular the transportation. What is ironic is that the original imagineers intended for Double Decker buses to supplement the monorails. Now, everyone is up in arms about having to take a bus when they are staying at a monorail resort.
But yet many of those same posters want the so-called "original intent".Does this mean they are okay with buses?
... And again, if we use RFID chips, barcodes, CM's checking tickets or CM's with a bullhorn, how do we handle those who just want to visit a monorail resort to eat at Chef Mickey's, shop at the Poly or rent a Sea Raycer from Sammy Duval's? Disney wants that revenue from those not staying at a monorail resort so why would they revert back to the days of limiting access?
Cindyfan said she thought it was the "original intent" of the resort monorail itself... I don't think she was referring to Disney's original conceptualizations of how tranportation would work. Obviously none of us know that unless we were at those planning meetings, but in the end this is the design they went with ... a monorail servicing TTC to MK and a monorail servicing the resorts around the lagoon.
Obviously the TTC stop was built in to allow non resort guests access for dining and monorail resort guests access to the TTC.
I think most people who have spoken about "limiting access" are talking only about boarding at MK for people not travelling to a resort and only during the busiest times.
It's amazing how these threads take on a life of their own. Someone makes an innocent comment or expresses a particular POV, it ticks someone else off and the debate/tangent ensues. I blame this all on Disney (because that's what we all like to do anyways!
