TheDisneyGirl02
<font color=navy>I found my Disney Prince!<br><fon
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2006
- Messages
- 7,773
The DisneyGirl, taking that cruise might be the best thing for you. My husband had already arranged for a trip to Disney World before I got laid off last month. The company didn't tell us that it was closing for forever until about a week before it actually did. I was so sick from Type 1 diabetes that I didn't even know I had that I met my current doctor in the intensive care unit in January. Those treating me have told me that taking a trip would be the best thing for my health now and that there is no sense in canceling the flight while the tickets are non-refundable anyway so we are going because I can't work if I am sick. In other words, I have been medically advised to take this vacation so we are going with plans to just be careful about how much we spend beyond what has already been paid for.
I am planning to use the trip to see what the work situation is like around Orlando. I am very afraid to move after what happened to us the first time we moved to a place with more jobs because we were homeless even after we were working, but it can't hurt to ask because Orlando have more of the type of work that I normally do anyway. My willingness to do hard work many former executives consider beneath themselves means that I might do okay at finding a living wage. You never know who you might meet on that cruise TheDisneyGirl. Maybe your connection to your next job is going to be there with you.
You are so stressed out TheDisneyGirl that you might find that offers start coming for jobs after you return from your cruise more relaxed and enthused to get a fresh start. I told my doctor that we should not be spending money from my husband's retirement account to go on vacation while I am not working. She said that she would write a prescription for me to go on vacation "doctor's orders" if it were legal for her to do so.
Thank you.

I wondered, while reading this thread, how long it would be before someone quoted the obnoxious, derogatory, term "Funemployment." What a disgrace.
As many of the people who have responded to this thread have already observed, it is easy to blame the unemployed for the problem of unemployment. Easy, but absolutely wrong and absurd.
I was laid off from one of the major law firms in Philadelphia; the 3 of many lay-offs where entire jobs were eliminated and many hard-working and diligent people were left without jobs. One of the major law firms in the city even closed their doors, leaving hundreds more stranded. I thought I would be out of a job for a few weeks: turned out it was 18 months. First of all, most of the law firms were laying off, and second: at age 55 I was not at the desired age for the employers who were hiring. Funemployment? Bull. I was in a panic every single day and spending hours applying for jobs and interviewing at places who didn't have the courtesy to ever get back to me. A part-time job? Forget about it. I have years of retail experience which did me no good. I also had a brother-in-law in the same situation, who worked harder than anyone I ever saw to obtain any type of employment. I cannot believe people are actually not only buying into the funemployment idea, but having the audacity to perpetuate it. It is a disservice to 99.9% of the unemployed; and perhaps to 100%. Everyone prefaces their quoting funemployment with a speech about "those truly looking for work" but you're making a judgment you have no right to make. While you may have family members who say they're enjoying unemployment, my guess is it's false bravado in light of the rejection they're facing when trying to get a job.

Couldn't have said it better myself!