Who cares??
If it weren't for Walt, this board would not exist.
Obviously you not only did you take the time to read it but you took the time to post. If you really didn't care just move on along.
Here is a Facebook post from this evening from the Walt Disney Family Museum :
Sarcastic much?? Don't think I'm the only one that has posted (or thinks) that what Meryl Streep says/thinks is of no concern. She is no better/worse than me or anyone that has an opinion!
So, your opinion is worth so much more than anyone elses?? I can read, and I also read most of the previous answer rebutting what was said.
Thanks for your concern for my time - but when I decide to 'move on' will be my decision.
Here's a link to the same post on the waltdisney.org web site:I'm sorry if that whole quote didn't post correctly. I think it was the copying and pasting from Facebook that did it to my post here.
So does that mean we must dismiss the evidence they cite because they naturally have a desire to defend him?LOL What else did you expect them to say?
Not true we would all be here for our love of bacon
I thought it was a pretty good refutation.So does that mean we must dismiss the evidence they cite because they naturally have a desire to defend him?
So does that mean we must dismiss the evidence they cite because they naturally have a desire to defend him?
I thought it was a pretty good refutation.
Hey I never said my opnion was better then anyone else BUT when people put who care on something you post to me it reads sorry your post is much beneath me to even post on it so who cares. My point if you don't care why bother
Yep, and it was much better researched than that twit's (I'd use a different 3rd petter personally) original speech.
Sadly, I see a future in which the Disney company will try to distance itself from Walt, for the same reason that Meryl Streep made these comments - politics. I think in many ways this has already started.
Again, I'll say much thanks for deciding who posts, where they post, and what they say!
Also, for adding 'your' thoughts on what I post. Again, I'll say, 'who cares' what someone like Meryl Streep thinks, her 'thoughts' are worth no more than anyone elses.
If you put her on a pedestal, that's your right, but everyone doesn't.
I find the accusation by Streep that Walt Disney was anti-Semitic, whilst she is lauding Thompson, to be somewhat ironic.
Thompson is well known as a supporter of Palestine and has repeatedly called for boycotts against Israel.
Now, although Thompson herself may not be anti-Semitic, many of her fellow travellers certainly are.
ford family
Streep, in trying to build Thompson UP, decided to tear Disney DOWN. It was a cheap, lazy tactic.
The "source" only matters if you think they're lying in the evidence they cited. If Ms. Streep has any first-hand evidence that Disney himself was indeed an anti-Semite and didn't care for women (who, btw, comprised the rest of his immediate family) that counters what the Disney family pointed to... let's hear it.No, it means just like anything else, you have to consider the source.
I don't see anyone implying that... even "Saving Mr. Banks" showed some of his warts. He was deceitful at times towards Travers and showed that he would have made a good used car salesman when trying to get the movie rights signed over to him... and when he got what he wanted, he disregarded many of her wishes and well as Travers personally.Walt Disney wasn't a saint. He was a man, with flaws and faults. He wasn't perfect.
I really don't care what Meryl Streep has to say about any subject but this is non-news. Walt wasn't some God above reproach, he was a guy who happened to hold the same views as the majority of other men who lived during his time. It doesn't mean he was right to have them but he was a guy living in the first half of the twentieth century who thought the same as most people living in the first half of the twentieth century. It is what it is.