I approach meds with caution. They have their place. But they are not the be all and end all solution. Rather they are an umbrella under which the addled mind can repair itself. There's no sense at just hurling Celexa or Cymbalta at depression - therapy and counselling are needed too. Again, I reiterate though - they DO have their place.
We do vision and hearing for all third and seventh graders, as well as new students and special needs students. Teachers can also request for the CO to have a student tested during the school's v&h window. We used to test every child every year but that was before it was cut from the budget.They still do the vision and hearing screenings in our school district.
And there is no medical testing for ADHD. If a teacher suspects a child has it, or any other issue that is affecting learning and behaviors in the classroom, they absolutely CAN suggest testing, done BY THE SCHOOL. My son has ADHD and it was his teacher in 4th grade that informed me that he was having a hard time focusing in class. At home, it wasn't as noticeable because the demands weren't there. He already had an IEP and a behavior plan in place, but he was having noticeable difficulty. I simply spoke to his pediatrician during a routine annual exam who pulled out a one page checklist, asked me questions and then based on the answers, diagnosed him with Inattentive ADHD and prescribed medication. Couldn't have been easier. He is 18 now and began seeing a psychiatrist at age 14 who made the same diagnosis in the same manner.
Schools absolutely do need to be willing to do educational psychological testing when it's warranted due to a child struggling in class, and it's a shame that so many districts are not forthcoming about their OBLIGATION to do so when a student is struggling in school. They have Psychologists on staff for a reason. The unfortunate part is that parents don't usually know their rights.
Meds should always be used in conjunction with therapy. Most psychiatrists worth their salt will basically require it.
I agree with this, and I also think many of these differences existed when I was a kid, but the pace of the world was just slower. - If you had mild issues caused by neurodivergencies, you had more time to rest between draining social interactions, more time to notice patterns and figure out how to do things in a way you could handle. Today's kids live in a busier, louder, more quickly-changing world. It's harder to constantly adjust.The human species is always evolving. I firmly believe we are evolving in a way that makes these neurodivergencies more prominent. Maybe it's the environment, or maybe it's just a natural outcome of selection for useful traits.
Maybe not part of the curriculum but teachers should support the emotional well being of their students. They should have enough training to spot troubled children. There should be protocol to address these concerns. Yes academics are important but teachers spend the majority of the day with these kids. The focus should be on the total child IMOSchool is (or should be) about math, science, history, English…
I have a very soft heart for mental illness, but a school subject??? No.
Parents (remember those ?), and get your kids the medical help they need.
I think they try, but it's easier in younger grades when you have one class. High school teachers have too many students at once for that level of responsibility to each one.Maybe not part of the curriculum but teachers should support the emotional well being of their students. They should have enough training to spot troubled children. There should be protocol to address these concerns. Yes academics are important but teachers spend the majority of the day with these kids. The focus should be on the total child IMO
The younger the better. Too many are hardened at a very early age.I think they try, but it's easier in younger grades when you have one class. High school teachers have too many students at once for that level of responsibility to each one.
I agree with this. I DO think it is part of the responsibility of teachers to create a classroom community that supports the emotional well-being of their students. In order to do that, every good teacher I know does spend classroom time "teaching" students how to treat each other, how to take care of themselves, etc. It's part of being human. It's sad that we have to teach the basics of "be kind, don't bully, your happiness matters and you need to speak up when you are in trouble," etc., but we do. In the elementary classroom this a BIG part of teaching. Secondary teachers watch out for and "teach" these things as well, just less overtly.Maybe not part of the curriculum but teachers should support the emotional well being of their students. They should have enough training to spot troubled children. There should be protocol to address these concerns. Yes academics are important but teachers spend the majority of the day with these kids. The focus should be on the total child IMO
Absolutely! You've made a valid and crucial point about the significant impact of mental health on all aspects of a student's life. Mental well-being is indeed interconnected with academic success, personal growth, and future contributions to society. Allow me to expand on this further.Whatever. Mental health affectes everything else in your life. You can't be successful as a student if you are struggling with your mental health, and a major component of mental health is your social network/environment, which for kids is primarily schools. If schools fail to provide adequate mental health supports, they are failing to prepare kids to be successful adults who can positively contribute to society. Isn't that the entire point of education?
i'm with the crowd who thinks school is for academics. health care belongs in the realm of healthcare providers. "the school" is not the solution to societal ills. Unfortunately, I think the public school system takes on way too much regarding social concerns. it takes the emphasis off of the first objective of educating the student.
There will always be mental illness. And the diagnostic criteria will continue to evolve. It’s not realistic to expect everyone to be armchair shrinks.
My high school didn’t. I’m sure some do with much bigger budgets. But problems will still slip through the cracks.You are aware that school districts have been employing psychologists to work in achoolsfor decades, right? Like, literal ones, with degrees and training and everything.
My high school didn’t. I’m sure some do with much bigger budgets. But problems will still slip through the cracks.
If this really worked, we wouldn’t have all of the problems we have today.