idratherbeinwdw
<br><font face="comic sans MS" color=violet>I'll n
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2000
- Messages
- 1,353
ILPHIL said:Won't even touch the "moral" argument. You will ever get either side to accept the other's viewpoint. So let me bring up something I haven't noticed in this thread (must admit haven't read every post)...the ecomonic side of the issue.
I'm sure when it comes to setting the amount of dues, the accountants have to take into account projected expenses for replacing things as they wear out or break. I would have to think that consistently having any property used by more people than planned for is going to accelerate the life cycle and lead to the need for replacement sooner than if used by the expected number of people. My guess is that raises everyone's dues to some degree.
So, if your decision is to put 5, 6, however many in a 1 bedroom villa, can you really make the claim that your decision doesn't impact anyone else?
Just my slightly more than 2 cents worth...
This aspect has been mentioned on this thread. Some agree with your way of thinking. Some, like me, think it's all balanced out by people who stay with LESS than the amount allowed. For instance, I am going in January by myself to a one bedroom. Could have fit 3 more but chose to go that one alone. In April I am going to have a 2 BR for me, my 14 year old daughter, and her friend. So we will be 3 in an accomodation that is allowed to have 8. In October I am going with my 14 and 19 year old daughters, 3 of us in a two bedroom, 5 less than allowed. So IMHO (and the opinion of others who have written similar posts) underusing the rooms makes up for an occasional 5 person in a one bedroom.
