salmoneous
<img src="http://www.wdwinfo.com/dis-sponsor/image
- Joined
- Nov 10, 2005
- Messages
- 6,468
In all honestly, not trying to cause any trouble here and I hope this conversation will stay "fun". Let me start by laying out a few thoughts that I hope aren't controversial:
1) We can break the DVC resorts into two groups. Those associated with a "Deluxe" Disney hotel (VWL/BCV/BWV) and those in stand-alone DVC resorts.
2) DVC will work best when there is balance. For every 100 points hotel-associated owners want to use at stand-alones this year, you ideally have 100 points that stand-alone owners want to use at hotel-associated resorts.
3) In the future, DVC will add more stand-alone units than hotel associated. (This may be a bit controversial, but just from a space standpoint you can only build so many DVC's near the existing deluxe hotels; but you have almost unlimited space to build stand-alones).
4) You've got two options to keep balance should DVC add more stand-alone units. You'll either need to attract lots of owners to the stand-alones who aren't all that interested in the hotel-associated DVC's, or build stand alones that are attractive to hotel-associated owners.
5) For the first option, I can see something like a DVC-Hawaii attracting owners who aren't necessarily interested in staying at a hotel-associated DVC. But I'll save discussion of that option for another day, and focus on the second option.
What can Disney do when they build new stand-alone DVC's that will make them attractive to owners of hotel-associated DVC's. In particular, for those current hotel-associated owners who haven't been lured to the existing stand-alones, what features would, say, an EP resort have to have to lure you away from the hotel-associated.
Bigger units?
Cheaper (points/night) units?
Amenities you can't get at the hotel associated?
Interesting designs and theming?
1) We can break the DVC resorts into two groups. Those associated with a "Deluxe" Disney hotel (VWL/BCV/BWV) and those in stand-alone DVC resorts.
2) DVC will work best when there is balance. For every 100 points hotel-associated owners want to use at stand-alones this year, you ideally have 100 points that stand-alone owners want to use at hotel-associated resorts.
3) In the future, DVC will add more stand-alone units than hotel associated. (This may be a bit controversial, but just from a space standpoint you can only build so many DVC's near the existing deluxe hotels; but you have almost unlimited space to build stand-alones).
4) You've got two options to keep balance should DVC add more stand-alone units. You'll either need to attract lots of owners to the stand-alones who aren't all that interested in the hotel-associated DVC's, or build stand alones that are attractive to hotel-associated owners.
5) For the first option, I can see something like a DVC-Hawaii attracting owners who aren't necessarily interested in staying at a hotel-associated DVC. But I'll save discussion of that option for another day, and focus on the second option.
What can Disney do when they build new stand-alone DVC's that will make them attractive to owners of hotel-associated DVC's. In particular, for those current hotel-associated owners who haven't been lured to the existing stand-alones, what features would, say, an EP resort have to have to lure you away from the hotel-associated.
Bigger units?
Cheaper (points/night) units?
Amenities you can't get at the hotel associated?
Interesting designs and theming?