Hang on, are other hotels also ceasing cold(er) storage? If I stay at a higher end Hyatt, Hilton, etc, can I reasonably expect to put a few temperature-sensitive items in appropriate storage? If so, this is another example where Disney is offering a much higher priced lodging experience with less service than current industry. Pay more, get less.
My parents can't have their medication get too hot, so Disney is telling them "good luck with that" upon transfer? Because of a limited number of liability circumstances? This is ridiculous... Imagine removing service for instances of possible liability. They don't remove walkways because of risk of slipping, they put out a caution and walkers accept risk by its use. They no longer close the parks because of risk by airbourne disease transmission, they put out a caution and attendees accept risk by entering the park. Closing avenues to more safely store temp-sensitive goods is a cost cutting, service reduction opportunity. It is not in alignment with all the other ways in which Disney asserts inherent risk by availed use.