wilkeliza
DIS Legend
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2013
- Messages
- 14,109
Oh, I agree the ESA thing has gotten out of control. I feel for the people who really need those animals, and have trained animals, like those with PTSD or severe anxiety. The animals can really help in the right situation. And the bad, untrained animals give all service "type" animals a bad rap.
I wonder if anything can be done about those doctors notes. Absolutely ridiculous to just right a note so a person can have the dog/pet with them. There should be some guidelines there too.
I know my friend jumped through a lot of hoops to have her daughter be able to have the dog with her, including multiple consultations with multiple doctors who had to see a positive effect before they'd sign off on anything. It was quite the process. But I respect all of them for taking the situation seriously. It'd be nice if other health professionals would.
ESA and Service are different and that is the big thing. What you are describing for a trained dog for PTSD and severe anxiety can possibly be either. A PTSD or severe anxiety dog trained to perform a task to help mitigate the disability is a serve dog. So say your friend's daughter's dog is trained to remind her to take medication or trained to apply pressure to her chest if it sense and anxiety attack or trained to remove her from a situation that has trigger (real triggers not what you read about online) then it is a service dog. If it is just the mere presence that makes thing better than it is an ESA. For an ESA a school could make you have to get an IEP that say the dog is 100% a medical necessity and required for them to receive their free education before they allow it which is probably why your friend had to jump through hoops.