Looking for a better camera... don't know where to start ~HELP!~

shari2shop

Cinderella is proof that shoes can change a girl's
Joined
Jul 21, 2001
Messages
365
I have always only used the basic point and shoot cameras. I would like to buy a better camera. I have looked on several different web sites but I really don't understand all the terms and numbers. I would like something where I can learn how to use all the buttons and controls without investing a lot of money. So, can anyone recommend a few mid priced cameras that I can learn on.

Thanks!
 
A few things we'll need to know to offer help:
1. What's 'mid price' to you? A general budget range would be helpful.
2. What types of things do you want to photograph?
3. What P&S cameras have you last used, and what were the shortcomings you ran into with those cameras?
4. What size or weight are you willing to live with in a camera or camera system?

More details like this, and you can start to narrow the field. It sounds as if you could strongly benefit right now getting into some photography research - books about exposure, websites about controls, camera features and functions and how they work, etc. Even before you get a new camera - depending on your current P&S camera, you may even be able to start learning a whole lot more right now, even with the basic camera you have. Did you always leave that camera in Auto mode? Does it have other modes, or controls, and you just don't know what they do? Start by learning how those things work and how to set them on your own camera, then as you figure out what the shortcomings are, you can find your next camera that can let you grow more.
 
Everything the pp said and if you have the manual or can download it for your current camera that can help you better understand what it does. My favorite photography site is http://www.digital-photography-school.com/. I am still a newbie myself but this site helps me when I read something in the manual or a book and the crickets start chirping :rotfl2:.
 
I currently have a Kodak z915. I take mostly pictures of my kids and nature shots. I guess my main disappointment in my pictures is that they look so blah! I would like something where I can focus on one thing in the picture and have the rest sorta out of focus/fuzzy. I would also like to be able to take action shots of my kids playing sports. I"m a big scrapbooker so I'm alsway taking random shots of things.

The camera I have now cost about $300 when I bought it 2 years or so ago. Right now cost is not really a factor. I'm thinking a midlevel priced camera will be a little less complicated. I don't want to get a camera that is so complicated I can't figure out how to use it. That is why I'm thinking midlevel price range. When I figure out the basics I can then upgrade to a serious camera.
 

If you really want a lot of shots where you focus on the subject and want the background softened and blurred out then you want to look at DSLRs specifically cameras with f/2.0 or faster like f/1.4 lenses.

One characteristic of really fast lenses is (when wide open) the distance span where things are in focus is relatively shallow.

This usage has some limits, namely in daylight the camera's shutter speed may or may not go high enough to get the proper exposure.

The more common need for a fast lens is low light action shots.

Digital camera hints: http://www.cockam.com/digicam.htm
 
Seashore is right...basically, that nice shallow focus effect comes from the lens more than the camera, but is also a byproduct of a large sensor like those found on DSLRs. So your best bet for those types of shots will come from a DSLR and a fast or long lens. Now, that doesn't necessarily mean it's the ONLY way - just the best. You may decide you don't need the background to be smooth as syrup - maybe just a little softer and more blurred than the subject - in which case you won't necessarily need a super big aperture lens - even a DSLR with a kit lens might suffice for your needs, and be better than a P&S camera by far. The same goes for capturing action or movement - DSLRs by nature are better than P&S cameras - the lenses can be bought which are faster and brighter as needed for the quick shutter speeds, the focus systems are significantly faster and can track better, and they usually have faster continuous shooting modes.

Note that really any DSLR will be far more capable than your P&S, and even the simplest DSLR has far more ability and controls than you would know how to use or control, but they all function well enough in Auto mode too that you could get one, still shoot with it, get decent results, have greater abilities than you do with a P&S camera, and moreover have a ton of room to learn and grow with it as you do get more skilled.

The question is: do you want a DSLR? They're bigger, heavier, and often end up with multiple lenses to cover all your needs. Some to consider, that have decent 'auto' modes, and which have good prices, and might have some advantages for you to adapt to if not as skilled or knowledgeable about photography or DSLRs:
- Pentax KX - they can be found under $500, have excellent high ISO ability for low light, fast continuous frame rates, and are small and light compared to many other DSLRs...they have plenty of buttons and functions, but could be left in auto and work just fine, giving you time to get to know the camera. This camera has stabilization built into the body, so any attached lens would be stabilized.
- Sony A33 or A55 - very small and lightweight bodies, due to a specialized design with a fixed mirror inside (they're not technically 'DSLRs' but share the identical sensor and speed), can be found from $500-800ish depending on the model and lens choice. These have very good auto modes as well as plenty of manual capabilities as you get better, have the best video focus solution of any DSLR if you intend to use video at all, and for a P&S camera user, they can shoot in 'live view' mode using an electronic viewfinder or the LCD on the back of the camera at full, normal speed - focus, metering, continuous shooting, etc. This is unique with DSLRs, as only Sony versions can do this - all other DSLRs are very slow and limited in live view mode. They are very good at high ISO and very fast continuous shooters as well, at up to 10 frames per second. It also has stabilization in the body, so any attached lens is stabilized.

What else may work for you? Well it might be worth considering one of the new mirrorless large sensor cameras...these cameras have DSLR-sized sensors, but in very compact bodies much like a P&S camera - they take interchangeable lenses, but these are often much smaller and lighter than normal DSLR lenses. They can also be adapted to take full DSLR lenses for those who want to expand, and have full manual controls like a DSLR, but in a simplified menu and button layout required by the tiny bodies. They can equal DSLRs in every image quality statistic, from daylight to low light...the only place where they can't really keep up with DSLRs is in specialized shooting, like sports action, flying birds, etc. For kids moving around a yard, paired with the right lens and the high ISO ability, these cameras could probably handle your needs. These cameras include the Panasonic GH series, the Olympus PEN series, and the Sony NEX series. Many DSLR owners end up with one of these as a second camera, because they are so much smaller and lighter, yet can deliver equal image quality and still offer the photographic control that experienced shooters want...but they also have P&S style auto modes that are usually much more advanced than the auto modes on DSLRs - they can do the stuff P&S cameras can, like smile detection, face detection, automatic image stacking, built in HDR, automatic scene recognition, and more. They go for right around $500, and up depending on the model and lens...these might really be a good mid-way solution for you.
 
I currently have a Kodak z915. I take mostly pictures of my kids and nature shots. I guess my main disappointment in my pictures is that they look so blah! I would like something where I can focus on one thing in the picture and have the rest sorta out of focus/fuzzy. I would also like to be able to take action shots of my kids playing sports. I"m a big scrapbooker so I'm alsway taking random shots of things.

The camera I have now cost about $300 when I bought it 2 years or so ago. Right now cost is not really a factor. I'm thinking a midlevel priced camera will be a little less complicated. I don't want to get a camera that is so complicated I can't figure out how to use it. That is why I'm thinking midlevel price range. When I figure out the basics I can then upgrade to a serious camera.

I have been a Kodak lover since my first one dC4800 that I paid $500 for on clearance with a 3,1 mp. Then I went to the z812.
But I am anxious to get hands on with the NEW to release Kodak 990 MAX. The zoom and processor, CMOS all sound great. The price too.
I am so sold on Kodak ease and quailty, leary about a $$ investment to an upgrade.

Other wise I may go with a Sony A5 for compact, or feel the AS33.....
April 9th is the date of the new release, I hope I can hang on until then. It is so much easier to go with the Kodak auto setting, or scene's then to worry aout focusing with the Sony A5,
 


Disney Vacation Planning. Free. Done for You.
Our Authorized Disney Vacation Planners are here to provide personalized, expert advice, answer every question, and uncover the best discounts. Let Dreams Unlimited Travel take care of all the details, so you can sit back, relax, and enjoy a stress-free vacation.
Start Your Disney Vacation
Disney EarMarked Producer

New Posts







DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest DIS Tiktok DIS Twitter

Add as a preferred source on Google

Back
Top Bottom