Just for fun, and to try to bring some more data into the picture, I analyzed the distribution of point values by room/view type across current
DVC resorts. (All values are per-week for the sake of simplicity. I have this for all seasons, but am using Season 2 as an example below. I'm also excluding all views other than S, L, and TP, since I'm trying to find points of comparison for the Poly).
My hypothesis is that, given a Standard Studio point value, one can reasonably infer the rough price of other room/view types based on historical averages. DVD isn't required to follow a formula here, and there is variance in the data, but they set these prices for a reason, and there are reasonably consistent multipliers.
Historically, a Standard-view 1BR has been a bit more than 2x the price of a Studio. It varies by resort - from a low of 93% at BLT to a high of 134% at BWV -- but averages 107%. RIV and VGF are higher, at 114%. I think 110% is a reasonable estimate here.
2BR inventory can be measured as either a multiple of Studio pricing or as a multiple of 1BR pricing. Other than OKW and BWV, they've been reasonably consistent with 2BRs costing about 30% more than 1BRs and about 1.6x more than Studios. There is some variance -- BLT had relatively cheap 1BRs and relatively expensive 2BRs, while RIV and VGF are just painful across the board.
There's obviously some guesswork involved in even data-informed guest work, but I'd guess that a 1BR will be 110% more than a Studio, and a 2BR will be ~30% more than a 1BR (173% more than a Studio). That's based on historical data, but fairly heavily weighted toward the recent builds -- this is more like RIV than like OKW.
My other hypothesis is that Tower Studio point values will likely match existing Longhouse point values.
- If the longhouses are larger units and/or have that second shower, it's hard to justify much of a premium
- They also don't want to position the new product as inferior
- For the sake of simplicity, if it's the same association, might as well just make them match
- That's what they did recently with VGF
If we assume that is true, we can plug in multipliers and get a rough approximation of what a
point chart might look like:
It's certainly possible that they'll price the new Studios differently (higher or lower) than the Longhouses, or that they will apply different multipliers for different views/rooms. (In particular, I question whether they can really offer a premium 'theme park' room when it is so far across the lagoon, or at least whether they can command the type of premium for it they could from a closer resort.)
But I think it's an interesting exercise in what it might look like, using historical data (especially from VGF, BLT, and RIV) as expectation anchor points.