
By the end of this month, the United States will have six brigades in Iraq, by far its smallest footprint since the 2003 invasion. Those that remain are conventional combat brigades reconfigured slightly and rebranded "advise and assist brigades." The primary mission of those units and the roughly 4,500 U.S. special operations forces that will stay behind will be to train Iraqi troops. Under a bilateral agreement, all U.S. troops must be out of Iraq by Dec. 31, 2011.
What about the remaining 50,000 troops? Are they combat troops? Do we have any troops that are not combat troops? Sounds like we are just calling the remaining troops something other than combat troops.
I guess if we "rebrand" them they suddenly are not combat troops. It must be magic.
Gee willikers. Everyone's in a twist. I DID say it was COMBAT troops, not ALL troops.I did say there were still troops left. Here's the associated press article:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100819/ap_on_re_mi_ea/ml_iraq_americans_head_home
It has to start somewhere folks. Seems to me that this is a good thing. I'm glad the process is well under way and I thank those men and women for their service and sacrifice.
I think the point (at least my point) is that there still are combat troops in Iraq. Whatever their mission and whatever they are called, they are still combat troops and claims to the contrary are misleading at best.
I agree with you that this is a good thing from a big picture standpoint.