I think what you're saying is that you don't believe the estimated loss of profits and jobs is a problem related to counterfeit issues. Is that right? Because industry, in an effort to maximize profit, cares about its bottom line rather than individual jobs and workers. And that because consumers may never have spent the money anyway on the designer goods, it can't be hurting them. I'm honestly not trying to be argumentative, I'm just trying to understand your argument.
That's fairly accurate. This argument is a lot more common in the software industry that claims 80 gazillion dollars per year in lost profits on the assumption that the 15-year old kid who downloaded the $3000 AutoCAD program would have went to the store and bought it if it wasn't for those pirates. In the case of the handbag manufacturers you might ask how the technology to make these knockoffs made it into third world countries in the first place. Did they just suddenly decide to make shoes instead of baskets? File it under laying down with dogs and coming up with fleas.
If this is the case, my rebuttal would be from Ledbury Research, a team operating out of London.
"The research also claims to dispel the notion that consumers almost always know they are buying fakes. The report said as many as one in eight consumers bought a fake product in the past year but almost half of them - the equivalent of more than 3m people - believed they were buying the genuine item."
I accept the above argument as plausible... not necessarily true, but plausible if you are willing to acknowledge the blind stupidity of the average consumer (I'll do that

LV charges $1000 for a handbag -- Fact
LV doesn't have sales -- Fact
LV doesn't have middle men, outlets, wholesale websites, etc. -- Fact
So if you see a $1000 handbag advertised on Craigslist for $100, or at a purse party for $100, or at a flea market for $100 and you buy it, you are either:
A. Incredibly naive
B. Willing to suspend belief (this guy has an inside track to the buyers, this gal is desperate for rent money, etc.)
C. A willing participant in a criminal act
Personally I choose B. The people who did the study may have other opinions, but if you were a study participant and were given those 3 choices to defend your knockoff purchase which would you choose?
Anyway, by the sounds of it there's more going on with your argument than anything to do with counterfeits. The ethics of big business is very different and much bigger kettle of fish and one I don't feel at all qualified to debate.![]()
Then it's a good place to say that we'll agree to disagree.