First up; appreciate the thread being opened back up.
This thread could have ended up as a discussion about resources, but
I honestly think it still can. I believe in the power of boardmembers being able to regulate themselves. Give us a bit more space. Yes sometimes things will get said but it also gives the space to air said sentiments and together come to a conclusion some sentiments aren't always correct and grow from there. As long as there is no preverbial you-know-who-fights going on; why not give us all some credit we can have disagreements as adults, quarrel and get that back on course again.
I value Kathy for opening this topic. Not just for opening it but because she has the guts to do it. I personally was starting to feel more and more as if even mentioning and
ECV could equal getting your wrist slapped. Can just be me, but I'm also more and more hearing sounds of others having a same feeling. Which is very dangerous when not wanting it to cultivate into something like "them" versus "us".
This subject needs adressing. Let's get the feelings out in the open. Airing them is better than bottling it up. Not everybody will agree about each detail but we should all be able to agree that WDW needs to start on working a growthschedule for their accessibility feature as the group needing them also grows quickly.
We've got so much energy on these boards when it comes to subjects where anybody feels bashed. If we could use even just 20% of that energy into a continues combined effort, we could get a point across with WDW. Listening to that is a second, but we've seen from the recent bus-changes that apparently enough complaints from enough guests can trigger changes.
I can see where a company as WDW could perhaps even be stuck in the "how do you grow with these demands?", as we ourselves find the numbers sometimes overwhelming. Let's face it, it's a lot easier to move 100 abled bodied guests on a transportation system, through parks, in rides etc as 100 guests needing accessibility features. WDW has shown they do value accessibility, good odds there being an opening of some sort.
We on here all have experiences, which combined can be a huge source of knowledge. Which combined could just come up with some great ideas of expanding accessibility, dealing with the growing numbers in a more friendly way for all guests. We could be one heck of an advocate for these rights.
It is not about one group or another. We all benefit from better features, we all suffer when they are overstretched. If any I think those using an ECV (which -still?- mostly are rentals) will suffer more from it than those using a wheelchair, their clearly own owned ECV and other mobility aids. Why? Because it tends to be more difficult for the world to look beyond seeing somebody driving around at one moment and walking the other moment. When features become more scarse, we always see more of a 'fight for your right'-mentalitity. Let alone general public getting involved and things and voicing their opinion. Having a "visable obvious" need or own aid doesn't magically make all remarks, stares and what not disappear but I am convinced those are coming in a higher number for those using rental ECV's. Those will be hit the hardest and thus benefit the best from any keeping up with the growing demand. It's not "us" or "them", it's an "all together" thing.
I think most will agree that there needs to be some grow to keep up with the demands. That's an easy part. But how do you keep up with that? I'm totally curious what ideas others have about that. Or how a proper lobby from us loyal WDW-visiters with a need, could be build up. Is that even needed? Perhaps I'm nuts in some peoples vision?
To be honest, that last part is nothing new. I am actually nuts in certain ways.

Let's try to see if we can turn these less positive experiences some are starting to run into into something more positive. I'm convinced a real force can be made on this board, we've got enough people on here, enough talents, enough experience. I dare you all; proof me right or wrong.
Preferrably right of course, who doesn't like being right? 