BearcatsFan
<font color=green>we finally had a minute to breat
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2011
- Messages
- 8,089
Who cares about these people from your past cases? GET ON WITH IT ALREADY! 

Who cares about these people from your past cases? GET ON WITH IT ALREADY!![]()
Why is this being let in?
Its not relevant....
JM must have something under his sleeve......
Who cares about these people from your past cases? GET ON WITH IT ALREADY!![]()
These cases don't have anything to do with Jodi.
I can't stay awake!YAWN!!! YAWN!!! YAWN!!!
Boring, now if Nummmmmy thinks this is all boring, then this is the FIRST time I agree with Nummmmmy.
![]()
Maybe his strategy is just to let her ramblerambleramble like the other defense witnesses did = more stuff for him to use later that Jodi doesn't fit the profile as the abusee, but the abuser.![]()
These cases don't have anything to do with Jodi.
They kinda do because the DT is hoping that the jurors will pull references from these stories that are similar to what JA testified to regarding her experiences with TA and how he acted towards her and how he made her feel ...
I personally think that a lot of these stories actually make JA looks like the agresssor/abuser and the one with the problem ... but everybody sees and hears things differently ... And as is in this case, it only matters what the jury thinks ...
Word of the Day: Continuum![]()
Juan will be addressing all of this.