Actually she testified that they were "papers" with pictures of boys in their underwear. They jury can't watch Nancy Grace or anything. I try to view things as only what the jury can hear, and she said "papers" yesterday when referring to the pictures. Did I miss where she testified that they were "hard copies"? If so I apologize and my argument isn't valid! Thanks
I believe she had at first said the pictures were on the computer, but then the computer turned up clean. Hence the pictures on paper. And they were clear that the boys were in underwear, so she wouldn't be covering up child porn.
Mr Martinez will clear it all up, that and her finger too! If we ever get there.