NotUrsula
DIS Legend
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2002
- Messages
- 20,048
It would work a bit better than the grocery model if they use RFID tags. Grocers and hardware stores use a barcode in conjunction with a registered weight to try to keep down theft, and of course, it doesn't work all that well.
RFID tags alarm if they go through portals without being discharged, so you would have that to help keep loss down. However, a RFID tag small enough to put on a clothing tag has to be a touch-proximity tag; so there will have to be a station where you touch the tag to the station sensor to discharge it. Presumably the bags will be at the station as well. (Also, it isn't that difficult to buy a portable RFID cloner. A good thief could easily take one of those into a dressing room and desensitize a whole slew of tags.)
So, would it succeed? No. As an option it's great, but as the sole option it stinks.
RFID tags alarm if they go through portals without being discharged, so you would have that to help keep loss down. However, a RFID tag small enough to put on a clothing tag has to be a touch-proximity tag; so there will have to be a station where you touch the tag to the station sensor to discharge it. Presumably the bags will be at the station as well. (Also, it isn't that difficult to buy a portable RFID cloner. A good thief could easily take one of those into a dressing room and desensitize a whole slew of tags.)
So, would it succeed? No. As an option it's great, but as the sole option it stinks.