I wonder if this is really the case. The middle east has been in a power struggle, with two of the main players being Iraq and Iran. Granted, a majority of the middle east is against Israel, but, even before talking about Israel, one must first recognize that Iraq and Iran provided a stabilizing force to the region, very similar to the stabilizing force the US and USSR provided, through the use of weapons, for fear of those weapons being used. In this instance, IRAQ has been reduced to not being a stabilizing force at all. As a result, Iran has the ability to pursue its interests, which, by the way, were against those of Iraq. Iran's religious interests were not shared by Iraq, and as a result, the religious undertones of the current Hezbollah action may not have taken place, as a result of the pressure Iran would have felt from Iraq, in that Iraq would not have wanted Iran to attempt to control the area as they are currently doing.
Further, the Iraq action has showen the Middle East that the all powerful US cannot step into the region, exert control, and do so without problem. This serves to empower the region, in taking actions against the US, or US allies, as they kniow that the US will not take an active participation in the conflict. If the US was going to take action, the Iranian Nuke Proogram would already be in rubble.