It's about time...WDW height requirement infographic

[DisneyFive]

my guess is to keep the graphic consistent at all parks and so they don't have to change it if they do add a ride with a 48 inch requirement

Yeah, I would bet you're right. Maybe simply for consistency. Just noticed Epcot is also the same way. A 48"+ kid, but no ride that requires it. (Isn't Sum of all Thrills a pretty tall requirement though?)

I do feel it's confusing, especially looking back at our annual trips, some years when we've have kids over that 48" mark and those below. I would be looking for which rides require 48"+ since some of us would be able to go, and some not. Weird.

Dan

 

[yeheyprincex2]

cool charts, so cute. my four year old found out on his check up that he is tall enough for TOT.
Now everyday at least a few times a day I hear "mommy, I'm tall enough for TOT", with a big smile on his face.
I love it

 

[smraynor]

Thanks! Hey, I just checked out the link in your signature. Love the 70's slides. Very cool to see how things looked back in the day. At first I thought someone in your family took those photos, and I was thinking "Dang, someone has some camera skills", but then I read they were purchased slides from the 70's. Very nice either way. Also, I assume your "Scott" that is mentioned on the webpage?

So any ideas why they have a 48" kid on the MK graphic?

Dan

Hi Dan and thanks. I am the Scott. I have a real interest in Walt Disney World history and the design of the parks/attractions.

 

[smraynor]

I have not missed the second part of your Main Street discussion have I? Loved part one!

I just posted Main Street Part II!

 

[minniemous]

I just posted Main Street Part II!

Awesome I will check it out!

 

[Willow1213]

Interesting. I saw these on Pinteest about a month ago. It lists no height requirement for Mission:Space, but I know there is one.

 

[WendyLou]

thanks for the info!