and disagree with ncligs. ABSOLUTELY, we don't want people to withhold complaints, to only say positive things. When I first got on the DIS boards, there were some posters on the resorts board who were *incensed* at the Unofficial Guide to Disney World, a book that I have always viewed as invaluable for it's honesty and criticism, because they were upset that it was negative about some things. Personally, I thought that that was just plain silly. What good would a book like that be if it never criticized anything? And by the same token, what good would these boards be if everyone agreed, and no one ever criticized anything at WDW or within DVC?
Certainly, we want people to air their views - the only thing I would wish for is that people do it in a way that does not become an attack on others on the board. And no, it doesn't HAVE to have a personal name in it to be an attack. We are simply talking about common courtesy here, NOT about having people refrain from expressing their opinions.
On a side note, Dean, you have always stuck with facts and stayed out of any attacks, at least in all the threads that I have read. It is not that many people who do get nasty, but it makes a big impression when it does happen, and on the resort war threads, it happens a lot more than anywhere else here.
Ncligs, the big thing I disagree with you about is equating the number of posts on a thread to people 'enjoying' the thread. I'm sure there are plenty of people reading it who do enjoy it, like yourself, and there are *also* plenty of people reading and posting to it who keep reading and responding to it because they're so worked up and upset. Clearly, those threads are very emotional for a lot of people, but there's no connection between number of posts and people's 'enjoyment' of a thread... say, you're not a statistician, are you?
As far as signatures go, I have never seen anything offensive in anyone's signature - sometimes perplexing, but not offensive.

But who knows, maybe I don't pay enough attention.
