Mikey15
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2018
- Messages
- 1,413
The math makes sense to me because DVC is a finite contract, not a perpetuity. The caveat to the calculation that:That's why I think all the calculations about the cheapest resort for SAP that split the buy in cost by the total number of years are a bit rubbish. The newest resorts appear much more economical than they really are just because they have 10 or 15 extra years far in the future.
1. The cost per point per year assumes you keep the contract for its entire life
OR
1A. If you sell somewhere along the line, you can recover at least the remaining unamortized portion of the original purchase
Isn’t so bad in practice as DVC resale values tend to inflate over time as direct prices increase. This is just cost side, no potential appreciation is being considered. The math works so long as if you sold, say, CCV with 35 out of its 50 years remaining, that you recover at least 35/xx ths of what you paid for it.