I did a quick comparison of using DDP versus paying OOP, but for some reason just could not bring myself to justify using 2 TS credits per person for Signature Dining.
Please correct me if Im wrong, but the assumptions Im making are that 1 TS credit is worth $24 on the regular DDP (i.e. $37 = $3 (snack) + $ 10 (CS) + $24 (TS) ), and that you only get the entrée and dessert on the regular DDP.
So using CG as an example, for two adults, 4 TS = $96 (includes tax but not tips). If we stay within the confines of what DDP allows, what wed be getting would be 2 entrees (say average $32 each) and 2 desserts ($10 each), which total up to be $89.46 after taxes before tips. So we in fact would be losing about $6 by using the DDP. If appetizers were included with the DDP, however, it'd be a different story!
Am I missing something here or does someone else happen to think the same?
Please correct me if Im wrong, but the assumptions Im making are that 1 TS credit is worth $24 on the regular DDP (i.e. $37 = $3 (snack) + $ 10 (CS) + $24 (TS) ), and that you only get the entrée and dessert on the regular DDP.
So using CG as an example, for two adults, 4 TS = $96 (includes tax but not tips). If we stay within the confines of what DDP allows, what wed be getting would be 2 entrees (say average $32 each) and 2 desserts ($10 each), which total up to be $89.46 after taxes before tips. So we in fact would be losing about $6 by using the DDP. If appetizers were included with the DDP, however, it'd be a different story!
Am I missing something here or does someone else happen to think the same?
