mickeyfan2
DIS Legend
- Joined
- May 21, 2004
- Messages
- 16,084
Telling a lie to send a child to a school district they are not entitled to attend is wrong. Yes it is stealing from the tax payers.
Maybe "theft of services"? Not sure about that but in my opinion, it is stealing.
How about moving to a better district?
Oh brother. THAT'S what started this thread. My DD wanted to go to a different high school in the SAME tax district and the OP of this thread said that it was a form of stealing. Now it's not?![]()
I just remembered this. The school district line actually runs through our property. The previous owners picked the school that their kids would attend. I called the town to find out if we had that option (both districts are just as good) because I was curious. I was told to check my tax bill and whatever district I pay taxes to then that is the district that my kids must go to. So I pay for my kids to go to school where they go. If I wanted to send them to private school I would have to pay for tuition not just send them because I think it's a better school. Private schools get money from the state as well so what's the difference?
Private schools get money from the state as well so what's the difference?
Private schools can apply for gov't grants, but not every school does. And of those that do, not every school gets them.
And frankly there's no such thing as "a lifetime of poverty" to kids in bad districts. Those kids who are motivated to succeed will do so. In the worst schools you'll still find bright and motivated kids who get good grades, learn, and go on to college. Generally those kids have parents who care about their education, even if they aren't educated themselves.
Anne
Again, the State is requiring that the school districts have verified proof that the child is eligible to attend the school. Families living with other families would not have utlity bills therefore they would not be allowed to register at the school. We had to show eligibility for our kindergartener to be able to sign her up. For the families living with other families, what address do they use for legal means? What address do they have for ID?
.
I have a home in New Orleans, and it has been a part of my life for over 40 years.You can look at New Orleans, and say there's no lifetime of poverty???
Again, the State is requiring that the school districts have verified proof that the child is eligible to attend the school. Families living with other families would not have utlity bills therefore they would not be allowed to register at the school.
You can look at New Orleans, and say there's no lifetime of poverty???
Anyway, I'd never turn somebody in. I'd know they were just trying to do what's best for their kids.
For all of those whose solution is, "Just sell your house and move!" there's no doing that in Michigan now, really. Nobody's buying any houses here....people are just giving them back to the bank.
So if they are giving them back to the bank, why can't they move?![]()
Anne
I have a home in New Orleans, and it has been a part of my life for over 40 years.
I know of many, many people who escaped the projects in New Orleans to go on to be policemen, firemen, teachers, etc. It is not impossible.
The biggest handicap to the children living in New Orleans (and I agree the schools are horrible) is the babymommas who send their 6-7 year olds out to work for drug dealers. These precious little boys end up all too often as soul-less criminals.
The only way to save those children with worthless mothers (fathers usually long gone) is to take them away, but no one wants to do that. A mother who cares enough about her child to even slightly care about his or her education would be worth more than any school or teacher.
There are plenty of people from OLA who have escaped the cycle of poverty through hard work, caring aprents, and a personal ethic.
Yes, it is stealing. As someone else pointed out, in Illinois property tax dollars go to the individual districts. I live in a suburb of Chicago that is surrounded by the city of Chicago on three sides. These are not inner-city neighborhoods by any means. A good portion of the neighborhood to the east is quite wealthy with stunning historic homes. (If it weren't for the city schools and property taxes and the fact that prices were sky-high, we would have loved to live there.) To the south is a neighborhood populated by many teachers, firefighters, cops, and city workers who are abiding by the Chicago residency requirements of their jobs. To the north is a racially integrated neighborhood with a mix of new and old homes. Even though these are stable middle-class neighborhoods (with some very rich people thrown in for good measure), each year there are Chicago residents who try to misrepresent themselves and send their kids to suburban schools.
We have excellent schools and our district is strict. Each year we have to show three pieces of evidence of residency. We have been asked for our homeowners insurance policy. We are asked to anonymously report non-residents or those who misrepresent themselves. There are as many as five full investigations a year - which still cost less than it would cost to educate a child for a year. While I feel bad for the individual children affected by their parent's choices, I would probably report a child if necessary because our elementary schools each have at least three mobile classrooms just to keep class sizes down. I moved here ten years ago and paid taxes for nearly eight years before I had a child in the school system. I am grateful for our communities commitment to education and I don't want it compromised. If that sounds harsh, it is because I believe that housing is very affordable in this community and there are a fair number of rental units. Those who wish to attend the schools should make the effort to move to the community.