jennyanydots
<font color=blue>'Their behavior's not good and th
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2004
- Messages
- 1,127
See http://www.alternet.org/mediaculture/19265
Is the Fox News Channel about to lose its "Fair and Balanced" trademark?
Nothing is more likely to make a serious journalist, or a concerned news
consumer, gag than hearing the Fox News Channel smugly refer to itself,
day after day, as being "fair and balanced." But what really rubs salt
in the wound is this: Fox has actually registered those three words -
"fair and balanced" - as its signature trademark. Does this mean that
all journalists and news organizations in the world are legally
forbidden to use those words - not only to describe themselves - but for
virtually any purpose whatsoever?
As if to drive the point home, in August of 2003, Fox brought suit
against the humorist Al Franken and his publisher, EP Dutton/Penguin,
for allegedly infringing on Fox's three-word trademark. The offense?
Franken's book, Liars and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them (which attacked
Fox), was subtitled "A Fair and Balanced Look at the Right." However,
when Fox appealed for a preliminary injunction, U.S. District Judge
Denny Chin refused the request - adding that he found Fox's lawsuit to
be "wholly without merit, both factually and legally." The judge also
said that Fox's right to such a trademark was not very strong,
suggesting that, if challenged, it might well be revoked. "From a legal
point of view," said Judge Chin, "I think it is highly unlikely that the
phrase 'fair and balanced' is a valid trademark. I can't accept that
that phrase can be plucked out of the marketplace of ideas and slogans."
A few days later, instead of proceeding to trial - as was its right -
Fox abruptly decided to drop its lawsuit against Franken. There was no
follow up to Judge Chin's suggestion. So Fox was able to retain its
trademark registration - and the right to continue using it to
mischaracterize its news product as "Fair and Balanced." But perhaps not
for very much longer.
The Independent Media Institute ( IMI), parent organization of AlterNet,
filed a legal challenge with the U.S. Trademark Office that seeks to
strip Fox of its "Fair and Balanced" trademark registration on the
grounds that it was "merely descriptive" (making it ineligible for
trademark registration) as well as "false and misleading."
Is the Fox News Channel about to lose its "Fair and Balanced" trademark?
Nothing is more likely to make a serious journalist, or a concerned news
consumer, gag than hearing the Fox News Channel smugly refer to itself,
day after day, as being "fair and balanced." But what really rubs salt
in the wound is this: Fox has actually registered those three words -
"fair and balanced" - as its signature trademark. Does this mean that
all journalists and news organizations in the world are legally
forbidden to use those words - not only to describe themselves - but for
virtually any purpose whatsoever?
As if to drive the point home, in August of 2003, Fox brought suit
against the humorist Al Franken and his publisher, EP Dutton/Penguin,
for allegedly infringing on Fox's three-word trademark. The offense?
Franken's book, Liars and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them (which attacked
Fox), was subtitled "A Fair and Balanced Look at the Right." However,
when Fox appealed for a preliminary injunction, U.S. District Judge
Denny Chin refused the request - adding that he found Fox's lawsuit to
be "wholly without merit, both factually and legally." The judge also
said that Fox's right to such a trademark was not very strong,
suggesting that, if challenged, it might well be revoked. "From a legal
point of view," said Judge Chin, "I think it is highly unlikely that the
phrase 'fair and balanced' is a valid trademark. I can't accept that
that phrase can be plucked out of the marketplace of ideas and slogans."
A few days later, instead of proceeding to trial - as was its right -
Fox abruptly decided to drop its lawsuit against Franken. There was no
follow up to Judge Chin's suggestion. So Fox was able to retain its
trademark registration - and the right to continue using it to
mischaracterize its news product as "Fair and Balanced." But perhaps not
for very much longer.
The Independent Media Institute ( IMI), parent organization of AlterNet,
filed a legal challenge with the U.S. Trademark Office that seeks to
strip Fox of its "Fair and Balanced" trademark registration on the
grounds that it was "merely descriptive" (making it ineligible for
trademark registration) as well as "false and misleading."
