KevinFSU said:I didn't tell her to go to an attorney for medical treatment.I told her to make sure she was getting checked out. I also was suggesting a diagnostic, which most doctors will order in such a case, given a neck injury with a radicular component (not to mention just regular 'ol x-rays).
#1MMFan said:Define "radicular component". Well, that is rather a generalisation that most doctors will order MRI. You and I haven't examined the person, and unless given detailed history and examination there is a genuine need for an MRI, I certainly wouldn't order an expensive MRI unless a true serious problem is suspected; it is neither beneficial to patients or the health system to request inappropriately detailed investigations when symptoms/signs do not suggest serious pathology. If a doctor cannot recognise red flag symptoms and signs requiring further investigation and those symptoms which are more reassuring then clearly they need further training. I despise this knee-jerk reaction of "let's do every investigation under the sun just because we can". Where is the art of medicine in that? Oh, what component of a disc lesion did you expect to see on a regular ol' xray?

KevinFSU said:The x-rays have nothing to do with the radicular component, but to rule out a vertebral fracture.
or even a lawyer to make things equitable. You MIL most likely will get the proper care from WDW without having to resort to a lawyer..but many, many people get no help with their non WDW injuries. When one is in pain it is hard to "move on" if the pain is chronic. I am not sure how other countries handle medical testing and how one qualifies for various tests...but in the good ol' USA, with something as serious as a neck injury, I say roll out the MRI, x-rays, and specialists if it can help someone.
I thought all the other check areas had a roof? I'd like to a make sure I avoid them at all costs, since Murphy's Law genetically applies to me! 
lookingforward said:I don't think it is fair for the Medical doctor to question the lawyer's advice. I have neck problems that were caused by a horseback riding accident years ago. I suffer each and every day to a varying degree. It is not something bad enough to operate on but it causes me pain and stiffness and impedes the quality of my life.
In your MIL's case it would be prudent, in my humble non-medical doctor opinion to find out exactly what is going on in her neck. This way she can take corrective and protective action if need be. I certainly don't know what that has to do with England's medical system or anyone else. It is important for her to understand what the incident did to her neck for the long or short term.
I am not sure how other countries handle medical testing and how one qualifies for various tests...but in the good ol' USA, with something as serious as a neck injury, I say roll out the MRI, x-rays, and specialists if it can help someone.
). Other diagnostics depend on the signs and symptoms.KevinFSU said:5. Most people that talk about friviolous lawsuits don't have any clue about what they are talking about. Yes they exist, but are probably a small percentage of the total. Most people have absolutely no idea the kind of negligence and medical malpractice that goes on out there.
6. Suit would have to be brought here in Florida.
Any other questions, or concerns, feel free to ask.
. I like hearing all sides of things.
#1MMFan said:1. The UK is not exclusively England. I'm Scottish.
2. This is precisely why you are not a doctor. You fail to see there is a spectrum of neck injuries. To say "something as serious as a neck injury" shows that you have not considered this. If I have a patient who is determined to have investigations which I believe are unnecessary, sure, I would certainly not refuse to do these - after all it is a JOINT informed decision. When you say "roll out the MRI, x-rays, and the specialists if it can help someone" it shows a lack of understanding into the reason behind investigations. But, heck, if you don't have a good enough relationship with your doctor in order to trust him/her to help you make an informed decision before proceeding with tests that might not be necessary, then too bad. I'm not from the backwoods, I come from the place that has pioneered medicine whilst the US was in its infancy, with all due respect.
3. Forgive me if I'm putting 2 and 2 together and making 5, but you have to wonder, given an MRI etc is expensive, and will need to be claimed for, whether this is additional silver to line a lawyer's wallet when the eventual settlement is reached?