DMRick
I prefer to be tagless!
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2001
- Messages
- 12,819
I assume according to her counter, she is in Disney now. Hopefully having a nice peaceful nighttime.
I was very aware of those who stated their opnions nicely..but while I may have been surprised at how strong some felt about letting a baby cry for a short time, I still only felt they were giving their opinions, not being rude to the OP. Some people feel very strong about letting children cry, and they have the right to post that.
I felt that post I responded to insinuated that most were rude, and I just don't agree.
That said, letting a baby cry at all wasn't what the OP wanted to know. Her question was based more on the noise it would make while others were trying to sleep.
While I may not have had my own children at Disney in a number of years, I have had my grands (they've each been several times in their short lives), and I still know how I would feel about a baby crying and not hearing a parent go to it. While I don't think letting a baby cry for 5 minutes hurts the baby at all, that wasn't what the OP was asking, so I haven't commented on that. I'm not sure what difference it makes if someone hasn't had a baby in the house in a number of years or at all, for someone to answer if a baby crying a couple of times in the night for 3 - 5 minutes would be troublesome, and that's assuming a lot that a baby on vacation that crys every night loudly at home twice, will only cry twice for 3 - 5 minutes on vacation.
If it will make you feel better to pick out what you perceive as rude posts versus opinions, go ahead. I happen to think it's just as rude to lump a bunch of people together and call them rude, if they don't agree with you (not you, per se) as to actually be rude
I was very aware of those who stated their opnions nicely..but while I may have been surprised at how strong some felt about letting a baby cry for a short time, I still only felt they were giving their opinions, not being rude to the OP. Some people feel very strong about letting children cry, and they have the right to post that.
I felt that post I responded to insinuated that most were rude, and I just don't agree.
That said, letting a baby cry at all wasn't what the OP wanted to know. Her question was based more on the noise it would make while others were trying to sleep.
But I'm nervous she'll wake up others in the hotel
While I may not have had my own children at Disney in a number of years, I have had my grands (they've each been several times in their short lives), and I still know how I would feel about a baby crying and not hearing a parent go to it. While I don't think letting a baby cry for 5 minutes hurts the baby at all, that wasn't what the OP was asking, so I haven't commented on that. I'm not sure what difference it makes if someone hasn't had a baby in the house in a number of years or at all, for someone to answer if a baby crying a couple of times in the night for 3 - 5 minutes would be troublesome, and that's assuming a lot that a baby on vacation that crys every night loudly at home twice, will only cry twice for 3 - 5 minutes on vacation.
If it will make you feel better to pick out what you perceive as rude posts versus opinions, go ahead. I happen to think it's just as rude to lump a bunch of people together and call them rude, if they don't agree with you (not you, per se) as to actually be rude
DisneyPhD said:DMRick, this is an example of a poster that did not agree with the OP, but was not rude about it at all and was supportive of the OP. :