disneysteve said:
It sounds good on paper, but it often backfires because it fails to address what caused the problem in the first place. For example, I believe the stat is that 2/3 of people who take out home equity loans to pay off consumer debt proceed to run up their credit cards again and end up in far worse shape. Plus they've now put their house on the line. So if the OP takes out a new loan to pay off the existing debt but doesn't change the spending situation, she risks accumulating more debt in the future.
You can't borrow your way out of debt. That's the bottom line.
I don't want to speak for disneysteve or anyone else who advocates no borrowing to get out of debt--whether additional student loans, home equity, or credit cards (as was my caveat). But I generally agree with his claim.

It reflects my own thinking, borrowing money to pay off credit-card debt ("bad debt" in personal finance circles) is often a risky proposition.
Why? Because a lot of people who borrow money with the best of intentions--to climb out of a financial hole using a consolidation loan, or a loan that offers lower interest rates, or a combination--take these steps as a short-term solution. Many folks fail to take the important step of carefully evaluating & addressing the cause of the debt itself. Additional loans can provide what appears to be solution, but one which doesn't address the problem. This strategy, then, can end up increasing rather than decreasing debt.
People often take out these loans with the goal of paying back the debt more quickly. For instance, the debt has transferred from, for example, a credit card with 12.5% interest to, say, another card with 5% or another low-interest loan. That means more of your payments go to principal instead of interest. The new loan
can save someone money, but if and only if that person also has the self-awareness, strength, and ability not to add to the debt or to prolong paying back the debt. The loan isn't itself the problem, but neither is it truly a solution. Changed behavior
is...and altogether too often, taking out a loan to pay off debt indicates one's behavior has not changed.
Useless Personal Information
In recommending the OP avoid accumulating additional debt by shifting it to another lending source, I'm not attempting to judge the poster's ability to stick to a financial plan. Instead, I'm speaking from personal experience about the challenges to using a loan-transfer strategy to pay down debt. I won't go into my debt history, but I will admit that I'd tried various loan shifting/consolidation plans several times. And it was altogether too easy to slide back into bad habits when I had a little extra wiggle room on the credit card, or could defer payments on the debt transferred to a student loan, etc. It wasn't until I addressed the reason for spending money that I didn't have, committed to a stricter budget, and followed long-term strategies for debt reduction and increased savings that I emerged from the debt hole I'd dug for myself. And, unfortunately, that hole was far deeper than it needed to be, because I'd previously tried to use the relatively painless, quick fix of borrowing money to pay off debt. It wasn't until I made a lifestyle change (oddly enough, also language used by those who have successfully lost weight) that I succeeded in permanently paying off my debt.
And I admit this says more about me than the OP. I can't fully know her situation, and so I speak from mine. At the same time, I do think that old Shakespeare advice (offered by Polonius, in
Hamlet) rings true: "Neither a lender nor borrower be." Interestingly, it's in the same monologue as "Given every many your ear, but few your voice" and "To thine own self be true," so take my advice for what it may, or may not, be worth.

[And I can't believe I just used Shakespeare to support my worldview...sheesh, what a geek I am!

]