It's not a matter of seeking "satisfaction" because technically she is not entitled to an extension of her park pass. However, my assertion still stands. I think that Disney should have sold her the two days as a courtesy or as an offer of good will.
And exactly how was she supposed to know that a major snowstorm was going to delay Amtrak? Look into her crystal ball?
She didn't plan on staying an extra 2 days. She is forced to spend 2 extra days. IMO this is an extenuating circumstance and Disney should have upgraded her non-upgradable tickets as a courtesy to her. They didn't and I think it stinks. Especially when she chose to stay on property and not book a much cheaper offsite hotel. They are making money off her and possibly double dipping by filling a room that they may have already sold to someone who can't get to WDW because of the storm. Especially when the concierge at OKW told her that she could upgrade her tickets.
OP: I hope that you can make the best out of a bad situation.
Yes, that's exactly what I was getting at, but didn't express it quite so well. I believe that Disney's guest recovery policy was effectively destroyed by the change in customer behavior reflected by what you've alluded to, the expectation that every rule will be waived, and every procedure bypassed, so that the customer gets whatever the customer wants. Guest recovery used to do so many great things, but was effectively castrated because it could no longer be effectively directed towards cases of truly justifiable need (as opposed to cases of strong desire).Since when did exceptions to the rule become expected? Why bother having rules, if you (WDW) is expect to bend/break them in the name of customer service at all times.
The bolded part is what would make me angry. She was told that it could be done by someone who was supposed to have known the facts. Can you try to find this CM and have them help you since they told you it could be done?
Sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but they cut down the [lawnmower] tree. No idea why.![]()
That CM was apparently unaware that she had purchased special discounted tickets and assumed she had regular MYW tickets. The answer she ultimately got was the correct one for the discounted tickets.
Ooops !! I missed that small detail! sorry!![]()
And exactly how was she supposed to know that a major snowstorm was going to delay Amtrak? Look into her crystal ball?
She didn't plan on staying an extra 2 days. She is forced to spend 2 extra days. IMO this is an extenuating circumstance and Disney should have upgraded her non-upgradable tickets as a courtesy to her. They didn't and I think it stinks. Especially when she chose to stay on property and not book a much cheaper offsite hotel. They are making money off her and possibly double dipping by filling a room that they may have already sold to someone who can't get to WDW because of the storm. Especially when the concierge at OKW told her that she could upgrade her tickets.
OP: I hope that you can make the best out of a bad situation.
What Robin is saying, which I agree with completely, is that she didn't plan on being their two extra days. She is not asking for Disney to comp her the tickets, just to allow her to upgrade her tickets. Perhaps there maybe even could have been a compromise, but asking a guest who has spent their entire vacation with you, bought a multi-day tickets to your parks, to pay the huge fees for the one or two day tickets because of something beyond their control isn't good customer service. Do they HAVE to do it....no....is it something I would expect a company known for customer service, like Disney, to do? Absolutely.
Did Disney cause the snowstorm that delayed Amtrak? She wanted to pay $3 for a $75 item. Disney did not have to do the upgrade and did not.
What if she got to Disney and then her kids one by one started puking. Should Disney give her the difference back for the unused day on the tickets?
Things happen when one travels. Having travel insurance would have helped here and then she could have bought a 1 or 2 day ticket.
I would see this as an adventure and enjoy it as such.
Yes, that's exactly what I was getting at, but didn't express it quite so well. I believe that Disney's guest recovery policy was effectively destroyed by the change in customer behavior reflected by what you've alluded to, the expectation that every rule will be waived, and every procedure bypassed, so that the customer gets whatever the customer wants. Guest recovery used to do so many great things, but was effectively castrated because it could no longer be effectively directed towards cases of truly justifiable need (as opposed to cases of strong desire).
Hehe... most of the time (like over 80% of the time) that just give some nit-picker the opening they need to distract attention away from the point, because they don't like the point.Try simpler words next time.![]()
I suspect many of those who "gloss over" my posts do so because they don't like the business perspective, and would hate to be confronted with such a strongly-supported explanation of why consumers cannot reasonably expect to have what they want to have. But that's neither here nor there.I think most people gloss over your posts because you express yourself far more eloquently than necessary.
OP- hope you are out having a great time and if nothing else this shows why investing in trip insurance is so important.
How many should they do it for? As many that ask in this situation. The number of people who have non-upgradable tickets cannot be all that large compared to the people who already have valid tickets or those that can be upgraded. Not only is it the nice thing to do, but it also makes good business sense. The Disney business model is based on encouraging people to stay longer because they know that they make money off of people eating at restaurants and shopping. That's why after 3-4 days the price per extra day goes down drastically. Disney wants you to stay longer. I would contend that keeping the parks open for the next two days is a fixed cost and that extending the passes because of a situation out of the OP's control does not cost Disney a thing. It gains them so much more than they lose. It gains them good will from the OP and everyone else reading this. This would be a happy positive thread showing Disney in a good light and not a negative unhappy thread showing Disney to be intractable and uncompromising. It also gains them money freely spent by the OP. Hey kids! Two more days of fun at WDW! If I were the OP my pocketbook would be so tight right now it would squeak! They wouldn't get one more unnecessary dime from me. Lastly, it gains them a happy customer. If I were the OP in that situation, I would seriously re-think where to go on my next vacation.And how many guest over the course of business should they do this for, I am sure during the winter months many people get delayed, that is why it is recommended that when you travel during the winter months to have extras with you, esp emergency money or credit card. Even during the summer flights get cancelled due to thunder storms and such. How much should Disney give before it affects the bottom line?
Funny you mention that. Hotels do offer special weather rates when passengers are stranded in nearby airports. They could jack things up to their maximum rack rate that's listed on the back of the door. But they don't. Hmmm ... I wonder whyShe could have easily gotten stuck anywhere via her destination back home, should any of those business just give her stuff too.![]()