Dean
DIS Veteran<br><a href="http://www.wdwinfo.com/dis
- Joined
- Aug 19, 1999
- Messages
- 39,228
Doug, it's OK to disagree and OK to like SSR. There will be some that do and some that do not. But we've seen with the last 2 new resorts that some people bought one resort wanting another. This will happen and is happening with SSR as well, we've seen that already here on this board. The point was that it's likely to happen as a higher percentage with SSR than with the last 2. Actually the main point was that some people will want to buy from Disney directly or not know about resale and that a portion of them would prefer other resorts if they had the option. I believe that a higher percentage have and will buy SSR actually preferring others but will talk themselves into SSR because it's what's available from Disney. This is nothing new when DVC is selling a single resort on property but that combined with the likelihood that more people will buy SSR to stay other places than the reverse makes it a larger impact.Doug7856 said:Dean, I don't often disagree with your opinion on the timeshare industry and DVC, but I've seen you hint at this for some time and I would like to share my perspective. I've looked at DVC for about 10 years, but I simply did not like the accommodations enough to buy in -- particularly when compared to other Disney resorts. With the exception of BWV, I simply do not like the rooms (even though I may like the host resort such as Wilderness Lodge). When we saw the artist renderings of SSR we knew that Disney had finally built a DVC resort that we would enjoy. We like the landscaping and the small town resort feel that is unique to SSR (we feel that OKW is very spread out -- more so than SSR -- and doesn't have a complete resort feel), and most importantly we like the rooms. All of this is subjective and depends upon the likes and dislikes of the perspective buyers -- but for us SSR is a hit and the reason we purchased a membership in DVC.