anyone hear any rumours of special assessments they are going to pass on to owners? clearing debris, losing business and any even minor damage I'm sure will get passed to us. plus the treehouses sound like they had some damage too. anyone hear?
The Florida governor asked hotels to be lenient and allow pets during the evacuation. DVC and Disney do have service dogs from time to time in the rooms. And they have a cleaning method for removing pet dander and other accidents. It will cost more in maintenance I suppose, but to me it is a small expense compared possible lost lives because someone stays in their car with their pets because no hotel would accept them during a hurricane evacuation.
From what I heard on the TV and the TV media might be wrong, but not all shelters at schools etc allowed pets only a few of the many did.FWIW, the law is that shelters have to allow pets, but hotels still get the call. The governor asked hotels to allow the animals.
One of the Poly bungalows had major roof damage, and Tokelau definitely had damage too.
I think insurance rates will rise, too.
That's what I don't understand if you have one incident on your insurance then it will increase WHY?
There is also actuarial involvement. Hurricane activity has been on the rise, and that will be factored into premiums.
They have been going up, as I understand it, for the coastal resorts. But now you have a hurricane making an inland run two years running, and that has not been typical previously.Wouldn't the premiums go up before hurricane season and not after you had the last incident?
Don't get me wrong but why was dogs or other animals allowed in the rooms?
I get that service animals are needed but other animals are not. If the rooms require special cleaning afterwards are the renter paying for that?
I'm not a dog person or any other animal person for that matter so maybe it's just not for me to understand.
That's what I don't understand if you have one incident on your insurance then it will increase WHY?
In my country Denmark you can have several before it increases. Why do you get punished for one incident? I guess that each resort pay a lot to the insurance companies already. I understand that if you had a lot of incidents already your premium would raise.
I would be surprised if it weren't by property, unless there is a separate "natural disaster" policy of some kind. So much of insurance really is premises-specific.Coverage for named storms carry a high deductible, which will be passed to members. Hilton Head had a $750,000 deductible last year for Matthew, which caused a dues increase.
One question I have (I work in insurance) is do they have one policy that covers all WDW properties and does the deductible only apply once or does it apply to each premises? Supposedly Fort Wilderness has $1,000,000 in damage.
I can't imagine there was enough damage to make a SA a reasonable expectation but the members will pay the additional costs in one way or another. Likely out of capital reserves and a higher yearly fee.Coverage for named storms carry a high deductible, which will be passed to members. Hilton Head had a $750,000 deductible last year for Matthew, which caused a dues increase.
One question I have (I work in insurance) is do they have one policy that covers all WDW properties and does the deductible only apply once or does it apply to each premises? Supposedly Fort Wilderness has $1,000,000 in damage.