That's why I ignored the post.I hear you. But the wording in that post was argumentative and frankly sounded like s/he just wanted to start something. Which is why I brought it up. It was the tone of the post.
I don't care how much that young woman had to drink, it was NOT her fault that she was assaulted, and it's asinine and ignorant to imply, in any way, that she had any hand in her attack. That is all I have to say about that.
Who said it was her fault?
And, do you know all of the story? They are/were both CMs. How do you know, while in her drunken state, that she did not call him talking sexy and agreed to meet him in DTD and by the time she got there she was pretty close to passed out, yet he did what she promised? How do you know that she did not consent and was too inebriated to remember? How do you know that she wasn't awake enough for it, but too drunk to remember? The fact that he left "evidence" would make one consider there could be more to the story.
All that is for the court to decide.
Whenever I post a link, I worry that I'm violating board rules -- (so I hope someone will let me know if I am) -- but here's where I was looking at types of crimes committed in the area: http://spotcrime.com/fl/lake+buena+vistaJess_S, would it be possible for you to show us the maps or at least a link to to those crime maps you were looking at?
Who said it was her fault?
And, do you know all of the story? They are/were both CMs. How do you know, while in her drunken state, that she did not call him talking sexy and agreed to meet him in DTD and by the time she got there she was pretty close to passed out, yet he did what she promised? How do you know that she did not consent and was too inebriated to remember? How do you know that she wasn't awake enough for it, but too drunk to remember? The fact that he left "evidence" would make one consider there could be more to the story.
You can post links - it's fine.Whenever I post a link, I worry that I'm violating board rules -- (so I hope someone will let me know if I am) -- but here's where I was looking at types of crimes committed in the area: http://spotcrime.com/fl/lake+buena+vista
You're wrong.
One, she was incapable of consent, due to being severely inebriated. So it doesn't matter what she did or didnt agree to, what she does or doesn't remember. It's rape. Period, end of sentence. The lady was incautious, the gentleman acted in a criminal manner.
Remember kids, it's a crime to take sexual advantage of someone when they're wasted.
Two, only an incredible louse would leave his "date" undressed and unconcious in the bushes. What if she'd choked on her own vomit and died? As the demonstrably more sober of the pair, the gentleman should have called 911 for her.
Three, anyone want to take bets on this thread being closed toute suite?

Whenever I post a link, I worry that I'm violating board rules -- (so I hope someone will let me know if I am) -- but here's where I was looking at types of crimes committed in the area: http://spotcrime.com/fl/lake+buena+vista
If she truly was out of it, then yes, he was 100% in the wrong and should go to prison. I do not disagree with that whatsoever. I was over-exxagerating in my previous statements, but my point was really that none of us know what really happened. I do not pretend to know what happened. If she was that far gone, then what he did was wrong. Years ago, when I was a waitress, I saw women who drank more than really big men and could still hold it together. That is what I based my response on. Again, I dont know all the facts - and neither do you....or anybody else on this forum. It is for the courts to hear and decide.
Who said it was her fault?
And, do you know all of the story? They are/were both CMs. How do you know, while in her drunken state, that she did not call him talking sexy and agreed to meet him in DTD and by the time she got there she was pretty close to passed out, yet he did what she promised? How do you know that she did not consent and was too inebriated to remember? How do you know that she wasn't awake enough for it, but too drunk to remember? The fact that he left "evidence" would make one consider there could be more to the story.
I know perfectly well what was reported in the media.
She was visibly inebriated at the party.
She had to lean on him to stay upright when the danced.
Cameras show her stumbling and leaning on him as they went out back.
The man in question told the cops that he tried to pull her out of the bushes, but she was too heavy for him to move. She was, at this point, too insensible to move herself. So he decided to leave her there. Didn't even bother to redress her.
She was discovered, passed out in the bushes, some hours later.
Fact is, the only detail that matters is that she was visibly, obviously, intoxicated. And thus incapable of consenting to anything.
This is GROSS.
I already said that I was exaggerating. I DO NOT condone assault of ANY KIND against any person. I was not aware until magpie said it that there was a confession of sorts.