undertheradar
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2002
- Messages
- 4,958
I don't consider a 4-year old and a 9-year-old unsupervised if they are in the care of a teenager.Since it is perfectly legal, then I can't see why children's services would be investigating unless my older child showed gross negligence in the care she was providing (which, knowing my child well, would not be the case).
If a pipe burst and a hotel employee was asking to be let into the room, then my child would call me on my cell and ask what she should do. I would then check with the front desk, make sure everything was on the up-and-up, and then have her wait with her sibling in the lobby until I came back.
Yes, I know emergencies can happen, but I have to say in all the hotel rooms that I've stayed in over the last 40 years (and there have been a lot), I don't think I've ever had a hotel employee insist that they had to enter my room at right that moment to check something out. I don't live in fear of the minute chance something catastrophic would happen, and even if it did, I trust my children's ability to cope with the situation until I could make it back to them.
I don't believe that a 13 y.o. is an adult, thus they are unsupervised from a hotel standpoint. As a veteran of the hotel industry with vast experience from a security perspective, there are times when the hotel employees must enter a room and cannot wait for the minor childrens parents to arrive for them to do so. Depending upon local laws, the hotel is responsible for those minor children(13,9,4) once they are aware that the children are in the room without an adult present. This is the same procedure with drunk guests. Even though the odds are in favor of the OP that nothing would happen, there is still that chance. Hotels are not the "safe" places that everyone thinks they are. You should be more cautious there due to the transient nature of the inhabitants. In fact, what age can you rent a room from Disney, that would give you an idea of the legal age for their properties.
Since it is perfectly legal, then I can't see why children's services would be investigating unless my older child showed gross negligence in the care she was providing (which, knowing my child well, would not be the case).
