Well I made the thread below 5 years ago, to use FP+ as a way to "pay for attraction expansion", and I'm still good with the idea.
Unfortunately the suggested price per pass back then was, lets say a bit lower than what's now likely. That or a much faster ROI anyway.
No not the system-but as future "pay to play" expansions.
This where I think/hope FP+ is headed.
Really just getting the idea on here, as I posted 10 years ago, they should let you obtain FP from your hotel-then 9 months later WDW patented a system that allows you to obtain FP from your hotel. Obviously they super expanded that with all the iphone and home pc advancements. Regardless it was stupid to have to go into the park and all the way to the attraction for a possible FP and acceptable return time.
But now, the only real complaint IMO about FP+ is-there are not enough FP+'s to go around, 3 is not enough etc.
Anyway-the suggestion is:
WDW would have a new revenue stream to create new headliners, if they have the FP+ to sell for those headliners.
So they take 1/2 of the attractions capacity and leave it as standby, then sell 1/2 as FP+.
So if it is similar to Space Mountain, then 1/2 would have capacity for 1,200 per hour or 14,400 per 12 hour day (each side) or 5,256,000 riders per year.
5 Million Fast Pass+'s per year-per new headliner.
From there, it's just a matter of fast the desired ROI.
At $10 per FP+ that's $50 million per year. 2 years for a $100 million ride. 4 years at $5 per FP+.
Or at $5 per FP+, 5 years will build a $250 million dollar attraction. $10 would build one for $500 million (can you say Lord of the Rings).
After the attraction is paid for-WDW can revert back to a no charge FP+ for that attraction-and now has an additional 5 million FP+'s to offer to guests.
SB riders would have no reason to complain as the attraction itself would not be there if not for the FP+ riders.
Now to be honest-if WDW want's to expand and not charge-well yea I will vote for that of course. But even 7DMT and Pandora will not add a lot or very fast.
Anyway-the suggestion is:
WDW would have a new revenue stream to create new headliners, if they have the FP+ to sell for those headliners.
So they take 1/2 of the attractions capacity and leave it as standby, then sell 1/2 as FP+.
So if it is similar to Space Mountain, then 1/2 would have capacity for 1,200 per hour or 14,400 per 12 hour day (each side) or 5,256,000 riders per year.
5 Million Fast Pass+'s per year-per new headliner.
From there, it's just a matter of fast the desired ROI.
At $10 per FP+ that's $50 million per year. 2 years for a $100 million ride. 4 years at $5 per FP+.
Or at $5 per FP+, 5 years will build a $250 million dollar attraction. $10 would build one for $500 million (can you say Lord of the Rings).
After the attraction is paid for-WDW can revert back to a no charge FP+ for that attraction-and now has an additional 5 million FP+'s to offer to guests.
SB riders would have no reason to complain as the attraction itself would not be there if not for the FP+ riders.
Now to be honest-if WDW want's to expand and not charge-well yea I will vote for that of course. But even 7DMT and Pandora will not add a lot or very fast.