Maistre Gracey
DIS Legend
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2002
- Messages
- 11,531
Hahahaha!!!!!!! Actually I copied the pp and it was spell check that fixed it, but still a very funny post!!!And you know enough to fix the spelling of his name!! LOL!!
MG
Hahahaha!!!!!!! Actually I copied the pp and it was spell check that fixed it, but still a very funny post!!!And you know enough to fix the spelling of his name!! LOL!!
Just got back from Disney in Sunday. My teens and young 20something still know Aerosmiths music and find them relevant. A lot of the teens these days are into 80s music. We all thouroughly enjoyed the ride several times and there were long lines waiting to get in it all the time.
Oldest ds 22 said Steven Tyler put on an amazing show at the Endymyion Mardi Grad extravaganza in New Orleans this year. He was very impressed with his performance.
I don't see it going anywhere for a while.
Wouldnt you think it would be the opposite though? Dont you think that Aerosmith probably is paying Disney for the Exposure? Just like old sponsors did at Epcot? I cant imagine Disney has been shelling out money to Aerosmith all these years. They wouldve went with more current band. They must have some type of deal worked out
Seems like Disney then got the raw end of that one!I doubt it. While it may have been a cross-potion between Geffen records, Aerosmith and Disney, but you can be pretty certain Disney had to secure the band's license, cut a deal with two record labels, handle the guaranteed royalties to the songwriters (who are not all Aerosmith); royalties to both record labels; royalty payments to the music publisher, etc.
Remember, when RnR was built, Aerosmtih was at a career high (of a very long career), and just had a huge hit with Disney for Armageddon.
But either way, Disney doesn't have carte blanche to use the bands logo/brand without band approval. Brands are too carefully managed for that.
It's doubtful Disney pays Aerosmith annual royalties. The Aerosmith connection was probably originally about corporate synergy. The movie Armageddon (which featured their music) was a Touchstone/Disney film released in 1998, and I think RnR opened in 1999. It was all probably covered in the same contract. Aerosmith was paid for their services and the use of their name probably only once.Wouldnt you think it would be the opposite though? Dont you think that Aerosmith probably is paying Disney for the Exposure? Just like old sponsors did at Epcot? I cant imagine Disney has been shelling out money to Aerosmith all these years. They wouldve went with more current band. They must have some type of deal worked out
It's doubtful Disney pays Aerosmith annual royalties. The Aerosmith connection was probably originally about corporate synergy. The movie Armageddon (which featured their music) was a Touchstone/Disney film released in 1998, and I think RnR opened in 1999. It was all probably covered in the same contract. Aerosmith was paid for their services and the use of their name probably only once.
I just think its silly of Disney this mega brand that sees millions of people to go through its parks a year, have to pay someone the rights for an attraction when they are getting advertisement on a majore level. Thats dumb on Disney to do that then. I was introduced to Aerosmith through RnR! I bought their cds because of that ride. I was born in 93 so didnt grow up knowing them. Seems like a silly move on disneys part. I didnt go to the ride becuase aerosmith was attached to it. I became a fan of aerosmith because they were part of an attraction id wdwIt's doubtful Disney pays Aerosmith annual royalties. The Aerosmith connection was probably originally about corporate synergy. The movie Armageddon (which featured their music) was a Touchstone/Disney film released in 1998, and I think RnR opened in 1999. It was all probably covered in the same contract. Aerosmith was paid for their services and the use of their name probably only once.
You might think it's a "silly move" but that's how licensing works. Company A (Disney in this case) pays Entity Z (Aerosmith) for use of their logo and music. If Aerosmith used Disney images in a video, then Aerosmith would pay Disney for use of that work.I just think its silly of Disney this mega brand that sees millions of people to go through its parks a year, have to pay someone the rights for an attraction when they are getting advertisement on a majore level. Thats dumb on Disney to do that then. I was introduced to Aerosmith through RnR! I bought their cds because of that ride. I was born in 93 so didnt grow up knowing them. Seems like a silly move on disneys part. I didnt go to the ride becuase aerosmith was attached to it. I became a fan of aerosmith because they were part of an attraction id wdw
I understand how licensing works, i just thinks its "silly" that a company like Walt Disney World couldnt get Aerosmith to pay them for advertising. I mean they recieve money and free coke products from Coca Cola just for the advertising power that comes from having you be the only soda product in one of the biggest tourists destinations in the US. I figured if Disney can get Coke like that, they could surely get a band, which doesnt have as near brand power as coke, to cut them some sort of dealYou might think it's a "silly move" but that's how licensing works. Company A (Disney in this case) pays Entity Z (Aerosmith) for use of their logo and music. If Aerosmith used Disney images in a video, then Aerosmith would pay Disney for use of that work.
And you know enough to fix the spelling of his name!! LOL!!
Maybe they should use Spinal Tap:
Big bottoms
Big bottoms
Talk about bum cakes
My girls got em
"How can I leave this behind"Maybe they should use Spinal Tap:
Big bottoms
Big bottoms
Talk about bum cakes
My girls got em
Maybe they could get the 7 Dwarfs to dance around Stonehenge to make it look proper size?Maybe they should use Spinal Tap:
Big bottoms
Big bottoms
Talk about bum cakes
My girls got em
Until some bonehead punk thinks gangsta' rap would appeal more to the masses....
Like the American Adventure attraction when they axed the US Olympic hockey clip.
MG
I think if they change RnR .. it needs to be rethemed away from Rock and Roll .. not just replaced by another (younger) band. It just wouldn't be the same.