>>we have been on 3 other cruises with them and everytime we looked they were doing some type of work <<
Granted, and my point was not imply that no maintenance is ever done or that the Magic is in horrible shape (which it is not). Rather, it was to compare the level of maintenance on it to those of ships on other cruise lines, ones we have actually sailed on. That is because -- irrespective of how many times one has been on
DCL -- one can't give a meaningful grade to anything (in this case, the condition of the Magic) without comparing it to something else.
And when one does that, the finding is the same: maintenance on the Magic is NOT up to the level of the general industry. And that isn't just my opinion. Every other post I've ever seen from experienced cruisers -- ergo, ones who have sailed on other cruise lines in addition to DCL -- on this board on this subject (and there have been several) agrees with my point - DCL just doesn't do quite as good a job in this area as competitors.
>>give them a little break, they are trying their best. <<
I'm not "after" DCL and/or the crew, but are they really "trying their best?" Again, I don't think they are, and that is surprising: Disney is known for a history of "keep it looking new and polished" at their parks, and I'd give most of their land resorts (at WDW or DL) high grades compared to the competiton, in terms of maintenance and condition.
As a result, I was surprised (and somewhat disappointed) by the condition of the Magic and don't see why DCL can't maintain it to Disney's historic property standards, much less those of the general cruise industry. Per my prior example, if Celebrity can afford put large groups of crew into regular maintenance, why can't DCL?