ilovemk76
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Oct 20, 2010
- Messages
- 3,497
I don't think they agreed to it, I think the bankruptcy Judge ordered them to mediation.
You are correct. The judge should not be telling them they must accept mediation.
I don't think they agreed to it, I think the bankruptcy Judge ordered them to mediation.
I have been a RN for almost 15 years. I have never worked anywhere union and have never seen conditions as you have described. I have worked all over the south including in states not known for always providing the best work conditions. What part of the country are you in?
Where in the world did you work? I have plenty of friends who are in the healthcare field and this is the first I've heard of this.FALSE. I am a nurse and my last job required 16 hour shifts with no break. Here is the USA. And neither the doctor nor the nurse should have to do that.In fact, I was not allowed to use the bathroom unless another nurse was in the building and I was the only one there. So I was breaking the rules to even go pee. And THIS is why the place is seeking out the union. AMongst other things.
You know how many more patients probably die from medication errors when tired health care workers make mistakes? Probably a lot I would venture.
No shareholders. Hostess is currently privately owned.Losing your job will not make paying the mortgage easier.
There is greed with all parties, shareholders, executives, management, workers and the union. Until all see that it is better to compromise jobs will continue to go overseas.
I think the ideal goal of bankruptcy court is to prevent bankruptcy; by ordering continued attempts at mediation (which, likely, the judge legally can do), his goal is to get the company to continue to operate.You are correct. The judge should not be telling them they must accept mediation.
You are correct. The judge should not be telling them they must accept mediation.
Actually, I think it is the law if they are trying to file for bankruptcy. You have to have exhausted all possible options before bankrutpcy can proceed.
Sort of what has happened to some individuals who attempted bankruptcy, because they didn't want to pay their bills, not because they couldn't afford to pay them. The Courts look at that and tell folks they can't file bankruptcy,they have to pay this bills.
Bimbo was in the early stages of buying the company. They own Sara Lee and they kept the factories open in the US. This is not the only US company they own.
Katie(whatever the rest is). That was a GENERAL statement about companies.
Hostess Brands Inc. Chief Executive Officer Gregory Rayburn said Grupo Bimbo SAB (BIMBOA) wont be a potential buyer for the bankrupt baker of Twinkies and Wonder Bread.
One misconception in the market is that Bimbo would be a buyer and bakery leadership told us in several plants that Bimbo would come in and buy, which is absurd, Rayburn said today in an interview with Bloomberg Television.
Rayburn cited Bimbos agreement with the U.S. Justice Department to sell some Sara Lee brands in order to complete its acquisition of Sara Lees North American bakery business.
Due to antitrust, it would never happen, Rayburn said.
kaytieeldr said:No shareholders. Hostess is currently privately owned.
I think the ideal goal of bankruptcy court is to prevent bankruptcy; by ordering continued attempts at mediation (which, likely, the judge legally can do), his goal is to get the company to continue to operate.
Bimbo was in the early stages of buying the company. They own Sara Lee and they kept the factories open in the US. This is not the only US company they own.
Katie(whatever the rest is). That was a GENERAL statement about companies.
There are shareholders in the private equity funds that own Hostess. Although depending on how it's structured, they could also be called members or partners. The underlying theory is the same, however, that the owners of the PE funds demand a return, often at the expense of the employees.
Otherwise, the fund would be referred to as a charity.![]()