snoopy said:
You said you didn't homeschool because public schools and teachers are bad. Why then did you choose to homeschool?
I .
I have a laundry list of reasons why I decided to homeschool..Here are some.
And I stated, I think most teachers are great. My kids had some wonderful teachers. I don't think PS's on the whole are bad, howver some are.
My kids had great teachers in a horrible district
,My DD's kindergarden class had 43 students in it until November .They finally added another portable classroom for the kids for the kids. Classrooms were portable trailors with only one window per classroom.. OSHA came in to investigate the school because there were so many sick kids..The reason....No air circulating in the classroom
Mandatory testing had become so extensive that teachers were spanding half of their time teaching these kids the test..When I say teaching the test,this was sometimes a literal description..In fact it was written up in the San Diego Union Tribune quite a few times.. MY DD'S teacher quit the year I pulled my kids out. She no longer felt she was able to properly teach the kids in her classroom as she had to spend so much test prep time... She's now teaching in a Private School
Oceanside School District was in the bottom 10% of the states schools at the time...This was not some Urban school either..This was a suburban school district.
My 2 youngest kids needed advanced classes. I was told this. I was also told those classes would not be available to them..There was no money for those classes.
Even with all of the problem sin the ditrict they were still cutting funding every single year. More and more programs were being pulled from the school
One other reason was a more personal one..I'm sick. Idon't know how much time I will have with my kids. I wanted to spend as much time with them as possible.
One of the reasons I moved back to RI was for better ,more affordable school districts..There are certainly problems here,but nothing like the ones faced by some California Schools Districts
One recent article about my old school district
January 6, 2005
OCEANSIDE Anticipating about $5 million in budget cuts over the next two years, Oceanside Unified School District has drafted an extensive list of programs and positions that could be eliminated.
Advertisement
Among the options are reducing campus security, cutting teacher's aides, increasing class sizes and closing small schools.
"We really don't have an option," said school board member Emily Wichmann. "We have to start looking at this now. It's a heads-up so nobody is blindsided. And it's all on the table, so everybody can work on it."
The district is expecting more cuts in state education revenue as California copes with its multibillion-dollar budget deficit, despite the economy's recovery.
Compounding the problem, Oceanside Unified's enrollment has declined by 884 students over the past two years. State funding is linked to enrollment, so the district faces additional financial losses.
Simultaneously, the cost of employee medical benefits has soared, rising 250 percent in five years, according to a district report.
In recent years, the district cut $16 million by curtailing the busing of more than 5,000 middle and high school students, dismantling the elementary school music program and eliminating positions, including nurses, assistant principals, counselors, clerical staff, librarians, custodians and deans.
Oceanside Unified expects to have $160.2 million in expenses this school year but only $156.4 million in funding. The district is dipping into its savings to avoid having to make major cuts. But that option is nearing an end.
Oceanside Unified will have $13.5 million left in its reserves at the end of the school year, but much of that can't be touched because the state requires districts to maintain some savings to deal with emergencies.
The budget and revenue vary from year to year. State revenue decreased by $9 million over two years in Oceanside Unified to $148.8 million last school year, while the district spent $151.1 million after major cuts. Revenue increased slightly this school year, but not enough to keep pace with soaring costs. The district projects similar state funding and expenditures next school year.
To address the discrepancy between revenue and costs, district administrators will advise the board to make up to $2.5 million in cuts next school year and dip further into savings to cover the remaining costs. A similar projected budget for the following year could mean about $2.5 million more in cuts.
Because more money is needed to meet rising costs, the district must make drastic cuts.
The district will have a better financial picture when Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger releases his budget proposal Monday, said Superintendent Ken Noonan, but schools must start planning now. It will be months after Schwarzenegger's proposal that the Legislature approves a final budget.
Noonan said the measures being discussed are not a list of recommendations, but possible options.
"We're presenting a whole menu of options for cuts now so the board can see the whole picture," he said. "We can narrow those cuts down."
Protecting small classes has been a priority during previous district budget cuts, but classes could be jeopardized now because trustees must consider more programs. The district has outlined some other possibilities:
Temporarily close elementary schools that have fewer than 500 students.
Ask employees to pay higher health insurance co-payments or modify their medical benefits in another manner.
Offer early retirement incentives and reduce positions through attrition.
Postpone construction of some schools, if they are not needed because of the enrollment decline.
Freeze salaries.
Eliminate the busing of elementary school children and older students who live on Camp Pendleton.
Save money by improving student attendance, and reduce spending on substitute teachers by finding ways to reduce employee absenteeism.
The district soon will hold public meetings to solicit input on possible budget cuts from parents, staff and the community.