It is apparent that several here did not have teachers who were good at teaching manners.
Manners have nothing to do with this situation, and you're rude to imply that it does.
The OP has MULTIPLE typos in her first post, and has not edited them out yet. She is looking for information on teaching high school at home for her child. Last year, they used correspondence courses and her son didn't like the format. I know I despised my one correspondence course in Mississippi government, so I can't imagine trying to academically excel for a whole year learning only from a book, without interaction with a great teacher and an intelligent group of classmates.
I think that may be what it comes down to for me. At some point, it no longer is what you can stuff in your kid's head from a book, but when your kid starts interacting with others to make their own logical connections. High school is when laboratory Physics, laboratory Chemistry, and laboratory Genetics classes start
making sense. I think if you decide not to allow your child the opportunity to take the academic classes needed to make the world
make sense, you aren't fulfilling your responsibility as a parent. If you can fulfill that parental mandate by partially homeschooling, bully for you. I know my mother had to send me to a public residential high school to meet her responsibility by me. I got to take Modern Physics, lab-based physics, lab-based genetics, lab-based chemistry, along with a host of other AMAZING classes I would not have been able to take safely at my house. I also played soccer and volleyball, served on Hall Council, and was part of a Physics Demonstration team, among other extracurricular responsibilities. And I did all of this in the PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM IN MISSISSIPPI. If I could do all of these accomplishments in the absolute worst school system in the US, I'm not buying homeschooling being a requirement for a good education for those of you in better states!
Don't prepare the path for your child; prepare your child for the path.
Brandie