Hillary Supporters unite part 2; no bashing please

Status
Not open for further replies.
both candidates and both spouses are far from perfect...and the same goes for McCain and his wife. I can also add that Hillary has made some duzzie(sp) in her campaign...but Hillary supporters can see this....some OS see Obamas downfalls...like REV Wright for one. But that is not my problem....I am watching this whole campaign with all 3 candidates with my eyes open...although a couple OS feel that I have my head in my butt and have not a clue with what is going on, have all the wrong facts and am stupid.:rotfl2:

But that's okay because the ones that are saying this are the ones who think they have all the answers when in fact...hmmm that word FACT gets tossed around here alot from other threads.... think that Obama has not a flaw. And so I shall say...Sorry but that FACT is not true.....
 
Hollywood Clinton backer said to threaten Pelosi with cutting off donations

Harvey Weinstein, the prominent movie producer and Democratic fundraiser, unleashed his legendary temper in a tirade aimed at House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

Weinstein, who’s backing Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign, threatened to cut off the cash flow to Democratic congressional candidates if Pelosi does not get behind a proposal to fund do-over primaries in Michigan and Florida, CNN reports. Clinton’s diminishing chances to snag the Democratic nomination are essentially dependent on seating delegates from those states at this summer’s convention.

“CNN has learned that this is an explosive conversation,” CNN’s Ed Henry reported Thursday morning. “Three officials say that Havery Weinstein appeared determined to try and buy Hillary Clinton more time in her battle with Barack Obama.”

Weinstein also pressed Pelosi to stop telling Democratic superdelegates that they should support whoever leads in the delegate count once the primaries are over in June.:thumbsup2

“Otherwise,” Henry reports, “Weinstein says he would help cut off money to House Democrats, in particular.”

Weinstein’s outburst is just the latest effort from Hollywood heavy hitters backing Clinton to pressure Pelosi on her superdelegate stand. In March, 20 Clinton fundraisers sent Pelosi a scathing letter urging her to repudiate her view on superdelegates. Signers of that letter, who did not include Weinstein, donated $24 million to Democratic causes, according to the Center for Responsive politics.

The Miramax founder who went on to form The Weinstein Co. has donated $400,000 to Democrats and allied causes since 1990, according to a database search.

Pelosi’s and Weinstein’s offices confirmed to CNN that the two had a conversation, but neither would characterize its tone. Henrys’ sources told him that Pelosi was not cowed by the bombastic figure.

“Don’t ever threaten me again,” she reportedly said.

:lmao:

http://rawstory.com/rawreplay/?p=1003
 
Hollywood Clinton backer said to threaten Pelosi with cutting off donations

Harvey Weinstein, the prominent movie producer and Democratic fundraiser, unleashed his legendary temper in a tirade aimed at House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

Weinstein, who’s backing Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign, threatened to cut off the cash flow to Democratic congressional candidates if Pelosi does not get behind a proposal to fund do-over primaries in Michigan and Florida, CNN reports. Clinton’s diminishing chances to snag the Democratic nomination are essentially dependent on seating delegates from those states at this summer’s convention.

“CNN has learned that this is an explosive conversation,” CNN’s Ed Henry reported Thursday morning. “Three officials say that Havery Weinstein appeared determined to try and buy Hillary Clinton more time in her battle with Barack Obama.”

Weinstein also pressed Pelosi to stop telling Democratic superdelegates that they should support whoever leads in the delegate count once the primaries are over in June.:thumbsup2

“Otherwise,” Henry reports, “Weinstein says he would help cut off money to House Democrats, in particular.”

Weinstein’s outburst is just the latest effort from Hollywood heavy hitters backing Clinton to pressure Pelosi on her superdelegate stand. In March, 20 Clinton fundraisers sent Pelosi a scathing letter urging her to repudiate her view on superdelegates. Signers of that letter, who did not include Weinstein, donated $24 million to Democratic causes, according to the Center for Responsive politics.

The Miramax founder who went on to form The Weinstein Co. has donated $400,000 to Democrats and allied causes since 1990, according to a database search.

Pelosi’s and Weinstein’s offices confirmed to CNN that the two had a conversation, but neither would characterize its tone. Henrys’ sources told him that Pelosi was not cowed by the bombastic figure.

“Don’t ever threaten me again,” she reportedly said.

:lmao:

http://rawstory.com/rawreplay/?p=1003

:rotfl2: Pelosi has been a joke to me ever since she first came into my sights...she is worthless in my opinion and she needs to be replaced....She is a bump in the DEM party and is usless as speeker.
 

Rumor has it that she's throwing a big party this weekend, but I wasn't invited :confused3.

:sad2: But I heard she is registered at Target!:lmao: You still have time to send a Blender!:yay:
 
Wow. Sounds like they had quite a tussle. :eek:

They made it sound like he was screaming at her on CNN!:thumbsup2
Good for him!

[QUOTE="Got Disney";25002903]:rotfl2: Pelosi has been a joke to me ever since she first came into my sights...she is worthless in my opinion and she needs to be replaced....She is a bump in the DEM party and is usless as speeker.[/QUOTE]

She is a TWIT! .....and talk about ELITIST!!!! Whoooooo hoooooooo! She takes the cake on that!
 
You know, I've been contemplating my feelings about Bill Clinton's affair or affairs. He was wrong to lie, but it just wasn't that big a deal to me who he (or Hillary for that matter) was sleeping with or where. I mean, I'd rather they not, but that's sort of between them and not my business. :confused3

So I looked at the other side of the coin. Would I be upset to find out Michelle or Obama was having a fling with someone else? Same answer. Wish they wouldn't, but it's between them. If discreet, these things are none of my affair.

The Rev. Wright thing bothered me more. I guess we all have certain things that set us off.
 
/
You know, I've been contemplating my feelings about Bill Clinton's affair or affairs. He was wrong to lie, but it just wasn't that big a deal to me who he (or Hillary for that matter) was sleeping with or where. I mean, I'd rather they not, but that's sort of between them and not my business. :confused3

So I looked at the other side of the coin. Would I be upset to find out Michelle or Obama was having a fling with someone else? Same answer. Wish they wouldn't, but it's between them. If discreet, these things are none of my affair.

The Rev. Wright thing bothered me more. I guess we all have certain things that set us off.

Same here!

Unless Monica influenced Bill will Anti American rederick, it's none of my business.

Obama sat there for 20 years, fully supported and revered the Rev...all while The Rev (in his own words) sprewed his Anti American agenda!
:sad2: :sad2: :sad2:
Then Obama tried to cover it up multiple times.:scared:
 
I have voted Republican since Gerald Ford. However, if Hillary wins I will vote for her. It has been appalling to watch how she has been railroaded by the media and other members of her own party. My theory is they all know if she is elected she will run a tight ship, but if Obama wins he is weak and they will do whatever they want. It's been a long time since many of the Democrat underlings have been able to run things in DC and with Obama they can be in charge. If Hillary wins they know she will keep them in line. She has made me proud!

I agree with this theory. He's the new kid on the block. I think the Senators and House Members feel they will have a free ride with Obama. Just like the Republican Senators and House Leadership had with their President Bush Jr.

I often thought he was a puppet - and a lousy one at that!
 
[QUOTE="Got Disney";25002903]:rotfl2: Pelosi has been a joke to me ever since she first came into my sights...she is worthless in my opinion and she needs to be replaced....She is a bump in the DEM party and is usless as speeker.[/QUOTE]

Pelosi has been a big disappointment to me - I was so excited when she was named as first woman speaker.

Where is her leadership? She seems to be following instead of leading...... I don't feel represented by her at all.
 
You know, I've been contemplating my feelings about Bill Clinton's affair or affairs. He was wrong to lie, but it just wasn't that big a deal to me who he (or Hillary for that matter) was sleeping with or where. I mean, I'd rather they not, but that's sort of between them and not my business. :confused3

So I looked at the other side of the coin. Would I be upset to find out Michelle or Obama was having a fling with someone else? Same answer. Wish they wouldn't, but it's between them. If discreet, these things are none of my affair.

The Rev. Wright thing bothered me more. I guess we all have certain things that set us off.

Ironically - what do I see on the National Enquirer headline last Saturday, while waiting on line in CVS - something about Obama having an affair.

I shook my head - but part of me remembered it in case it were to come true. After all - the Enquirer has a good track record when it comes to famous dirt.

I would still vote for him (still not happy about it lol).

I still think part of what got GWB elected was that he never had an affair. It still amuses me that the "fact" he was a former druggie, alcoholic, and slacker (National Guard) - the "fact" that he didn't have an affair and was "clean cut" mattered more........
 
Look out Obama - you're going to end up with Al Sharpton as a vocal supporter!

Sometimes the kiss of death - as local NY\NJ folks know!

More on Sharpton from NY1

In an interview on NY1’s “Inside City Hall,” the Rev. Al Sharpton says Hillary Clinton should drop out of the Democratic presidential race.

“There is no possible scenario that I see without the total destruction of the Democratic Party for Hillary Clinton to become the nominee,” Sharpton tells NY1 political anchor Dominic Carter.

“As you know, I’ve been in the ministry of civil rights all my life, but had dealings with entertainers because of James Brown. The worst thing in the world is when an entertainer doesn’t know when the show is over. The audience is gone, the lights are down, you’re getting ready to cut the mics off and you are still on the stage singing. It’s over, it’s all right, it’s over. Come sing another day, but this show is over Senator Clinton.”

See the full interview on “Inside City Hall” at 7 p.m. and 10 p.m. - and also watch Michael Scotto’s exclusive report examining the relationship between City Council Speaker Christine Quinn and her predecessor, Gifford Miller.

HERE is a portion of the interview:

“I think Barack Obama is the nominee, I think we should get ready for (Dominic: Wait, Barack Obama is the nominee?”) Oh, I think he’s won. There is no possible scenario that I see without the total destruction of the Democratic Party for Hillary Clinton to become the nominee. I mean the vote in North Carolina and the close vote in Indiana was it, as far as I can count. As far as I’m concerned it was over before, but now we are just kidding ourselves. I think that there is no possible way that Mrs. Clinton can win this nomination, and I think that if there are those looking at this and are concerned about her they would tell her that it’s time to just say it’s over. As you know, I’ve been in the ministry of civil rights all my life, but had dealings with entertainers because of James Brown. The worst thing in the world is when an entertainer doesn’t know when the show is over. The audience is gone, the lights are down, you’re getting ready to cut the mics off and you are still on the stage singing. It’s over, it’s all right, it’s over. Come sing another day, but this show is over Senator Clinton.It is over in terms of this nominating process, unless we’re going to change the rules, change how we do things; and when and if you do that in my judgment you are destroying the party. Barack Obama has run not only a good campaign and a credible campaign, and I told you before I respect it, he has won. He has got the most popular votes, he has got the most committed delegates, only unless you are going to change the rules can you deny him the nomination. If Mr. Clinton called me, or Senator Clinton called me and asked me for my advice I would tell them it’s over, they should withdraw for the good of the party because I think that there will be a formidable race in November that we need to start getting ready for now. And I think we need to stop playing this whole game of continuing to act like there is something to decide here, when the majority of democrats have already decided.You can still have good days, that show is over I said. I’m not saying she can’t sing another day, but this show is over.”
 
Article from MSNBC.

I don't believe he's serious about choosing Clinton as his VP. I think he's keeping that dangling to not totally alienate the Clinton supporter.

Obama confident about winning Clinton voters
Senator does not rule out Clinton as his vice presidential running mate




WASHINGTON - In the afterglow of his big victory in North Carolina's primary and with the presidential nomination seemingly only 175 delegates away, Sen. Barack Obama predicted Thursday that he could win the votes of Democrats who support his rival Sen. Hillary Clinton.

And, in an interview with Brian Williams of NBC News, he did not summarily reject the notion of Clinton serving on the ticket as his vice presidential running mate.

When Williams asked Obama if he already was the presumptive Democratic nominee, the Illinois senator said, "Not yet. I will be if Senator Clinton decides not to go on, or if we complete these six contests and we are ahead as we are now. But nothing is certain, I don't want to take it for granted."
Story continues below ↓advertisement

He continued, "Sen. Clinton has been written off before and came back, and she's a formidable candidate."

Obama's confidence about potentially winning over Clinton voters referred to opinion polling done in 2000 when Republicans John McCain and George Bush fought a fierce battle for their party’s nomination.

Obama said McCain supporters, disappointed after he lost the nomination, vowed they wouldn’t vote for Bush — but ultimately they did.

In exit poll interviews in Indiana and North Carolina on Tuesday, nearly one out of five voters said they’d choose McCain rather than Obama if the two men were to face each other on the Nov. 4 ballot.

Winning over voters
Obama said his campaign would embrace all voters, including those backing the former first lady.

“That doesn’t mean though that I don’t have lot of work to do if I end up being the nominee," he said, adding, "It's important for us to systematically reach out and describe for people — with as much specificity as possible — what, exactly an Obama presidency would mean."

“If I can say to people, 'Look, I might not have been your first choice, but here's how I'm going to allow you to send your kids to college, here's how I'm going to protect your pension, here's how I'm going to expand healthcare so you don't have to lose sleep at night trying to figure out whether or not you can afford to get sick,' then I think people will respond."

He predicted that it “won’t just be Democrats, it won't just be Clinton voters who will respond; I think there are a lot of independents out there are a lot of disaffected Republicans but also independents and dissaffected Republicans.”

Obama has claimed from the beginning of the campaign, even as early as January's Iowa caucuses, that he has been winning over Republican voters.

Remaking the electoral map
He said he would “remake the electoral map,” implying he would be more competitive that Democratic nominees John Kerry and Al Gore were in 2004 and in 2000 — particularly in states like North Carolina, Virginia, and Colorado, which they both failed to carry.

When Williams asked Obama whether he and his advisors had been having any discussions about declaring victory on May 20, the day of the Oregon and Kentucky primaries, Obama said, “That will be an important day. If at that point, we have the majority of pledged delegates, which is possible, then we can make a pretty strong claim that we've got the most runs and it's the ninth inning and we've won.”

As for the idea of Clinton being his vice president, Obama said, “There's no doubt that she is qualified to be vice president. There's no doubt that she's qualified to be president….I think anybody who has been in a political contest with her can tell you that she's no pushover."

Earlier in the day, Obama caused a stir on Capitol Hill by bringing his campaign directly to the floor of the House of Representatives.

Shepherded by two of his supporters, Rep. Melissa Bean of Illinois and Rep. Steve Rothman of New Jersey, Obama walked through the chamber, chatting with House Democrats including a few of the undecided members.

Each of the House Democrats is an ex officio superdelegate with a vote at the convention.

'They need each other'
Before Obama's visit, one of Clinton’s House champions, Rep. Jim McGovern of Massachusetts, said, “I’m not throwing in the towel. If it were anyone else, if Hillary Clinton were a ‘mere mortal’”, then the battle might be over. But, he said, her extraordinary skill as campaigner kept the contest going.

Whatever happens, McGovern said, “The person who finished number two is going to be just as important as the person who finished number one. They need each other to get across the finish line" in November.

While Obama was campaigning among the House superdelegates at the Capitol, Clinton was appealing to Democratic voters by holding rallies in West Virginia, which holds its primary next Tuesday. It is a state where Clinton is expected to perform well.
 
To me, it wasn't the affair, but he lied and lied big, he was busted then he had no choice but to come up clean.

I can't stand liars.
 
Article from MSNBC.

I don't believe he's serious about choosing Clinton as his VP. I think he's keeping that dangling to not totally alienate the Clinton supporter.

he said the same thing tonight on CNN interview and i almost fell out of my seat :eek: the question came to him due to the blue collar workers would he think about adding her as his VP. He said that she would be any candidates first choice and he is not ruling that out but she is still in the race and he has not won it yet. Could you just imagine the vote total if they did that.

He sounded sincere. However he is a politician and could be saying that to get more votes or win states by saying that:confused3 I think if they were working together they could accomplish a lot and could you see Hillary debating McCain's VP...I would feel sorry for him.

McCain's supporters are very upset with him at the moment with issues he is bringing forth that are moderate and not so conservative. WELL I dont get that he has always been stated as more of a moderate conservative...
 
[QUOTE="Got Disney";25006527]he said the same thing tonight on CNN interview and i almost fell out of my seat :eek: ...[/QUOTE]

I have to say Obama came off WONDERFULLY in todays CNN interview with Wolf Blitzer.

:scared: "You Say"!!!!:lmao:

Granted Wolf just gave him alllllllllllll softball type questions. The only 'hard" type questions were "what is wrong with McCain" stuff. Real Lame. Wolf never held Obama up to anything he said. It was a breeze! And I am sure Obama had a preview to all questions.:rolleyes1

But now here comes what I thought was :lmao: !

Jack Cafferty response to the interview was GUSHING:love: :love: ! Me thinks Ole Jack got a HUGE ManCRUSH on Obama!;)
 
I have to say Obama came off WONDERFULLY in todays CNN interview with Wolf Blitzer.

:scared: "You Say"!!!!:lmao:

Granted Wolf just gave him alllllllllllll softball type questions. The only 'hard" type questions were "what is wrong with McCain" stuff. Real Lame. Wolf never held Obama up to anything he said. It was a breeze! And I am sure Obama had a preview to all questions.:rolleyes1

But now here comes what I thought was :lmao: !

Jack Cafferty response to the interview was GUSHING:love: :love: ! Me thinks Ole Jack got a HUGE ManCRUSH on Obama!;)

YEs Me agrees with you...he has always loved Obama....or just hates Hillary...maybe both :rotfl2: And I agree it was a very easy interview and very relaxed. It seemed rehearsed because he did not stammer as he usually does. He knew what to say and when to say it. But it was a good interview. Some of the OS are in a hissy fit over his VP comment about Hillary...some want Richardson. I sure hope not. Edwards would be nice but think he still needs someone that is a little stronger. If not Hillary than someone like her. If he picked Hillary that would solve a lot of problems.

Some of the OS feel that she is just staying in the race because know that she cant get the POTUS she feels intiteled to be given the VP :laughing: ....there are a few other choice remarks but that gives you the idea. Nothing bad some just dont want her around at all no matter what...

who he picks as a VP will make a difference to everyone other than the OS.
 
[QUOTE="Got Disney";25007025]YEs Me agrees with you...he has always loved Obama....or just hates Hillary...maybe both :rotfl2: And I agree it was a very easy interview and very relaxed. It seemed rehearsed because he did not stammer as he usually does. He knew what to say and when to say it. But it was a good interview. Some of the OS are in a hissy fit over his VP comment about Hillary...some want Richardson. I sure hope not. Edwards would be nice but think he still needs someone that is a little stronger. If not Hillary than someone like her. If he picked Hillary that would solve a lot of problems.

Some of the OS feel that she is just staying in the race because know that she cant get the POTUS she feels intiteled to be given the VP :laughing: ....there are a few other choice remarks but that gives you the idea. Nothing bad some just dont want her around at all no matter what...

who he picks as a VP will make a difference to everyone other than the OS.[/QUOTE]

FYI...I am not too sure what it was about, i just heard on CNN (i was on the phone) but seems like Richardson is in some sort of trouble in New Mexico!
 
FYI...I am not too sure what it was about, i just heard on CNN (i was on the phone) but seems like Richardson is in some sort of trouble in New Mexico!

I did not hear that. If thats the case than he may not be a good choice:rotfl2:
 
I don't think Richardson would be a good choice. There's other stronger VP possibilities out there. He doesn't have to pick Hillary and I don't think I would want him to. I don't think either would like being 2nd string to the other. That's a blow. I think he or she could do much better as a senator.

I don't agree with a few things about Pelosi. She's a little too left and extreme for me. I think Pelosi should stay out of the Super delegate decisions and let them vote how they want to. That's the only part of the recent news I'm going to comment on...the rest is...:rolleyes:

I also agreed with Terry McAuliffe who said we should just let this thing ride out through June 3rd and then let the super delegates vote. It doesn't sound like they would let this thing ride to the convention.

I'm sure the board will be much nicer when I'm gone for a week. I'll check back in later in the day, but I have to go pack the kids stuff and wash anything that's needed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.













Receive up to $1,000 in Onboard Credit and a Gift Basket!
That’s right — when you book your Disney Cruise with Dreams Unlimited Travel, you’ll receive incredible shipboard credits to spend during your vacation!
CLICK HERE








New Posts







DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest DIS Tiktok DIS Twitter

Back
Top