morgan98
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- May 29, 2010
- Messages
- 2,275
Well, yeah. It's the teacher who wants to throw this elaborate fiesta in the first place. Why should the burden of time and expense be put on the students and parents who, if given the option, would rather opt out? Cooking and transporting three courses worth of food for thirty people is an undue burden in terms of homework assignments, nor is there any justifiable reason for assigning such a project. What educational value is there to be had in eating guacamole?
Bottom line, the teacher wants to throw a party. That's fine, I'm sure it will be a welcome change of pace from normal class lessons for both the teacher and students, but don't try to mask what should be an elective fluff activity as mandatory and grade-worthy. Make participation voluntary, for extra credit, or scale it back to chips and soda and have the teacher provide the supplies herself. Or, if that's still too much outside-of-the-classroom work for her, she can skip it altogether and use the class period to teach.
FWIW, I'm surprised schools still allow this kind of thing. With all the potential risks of allergies/cross-contamination/food safety concerns/storage and temperature requirements, you'd think they'd rather avoid this kind of liability. It'd be all too easy for a kid to undercook the chicken enchiladas and infect thirty students with salmonella.
And what about parents who have obligations such as a work schedule that cannot get all of the food to school? Are they supposed to not take a business trip or miss a presentation in order to get everything to school in time for class? This seems like a homework assignment for the parent not for the child.
I firmly believe homework should be something the child can complete pretty much on their own. Now, I am reasonable and think reinforcing concepts or some help here and there is fine, but when the majority of the task falls to the parents that is when it loses value (at least in my opinion).