I don't know that answer. But, I'll ask when I work tomorrow.Do you know if your second vaccine is sitting in a freezer waiting for you, or if they are relying on getting a second shipment for the second dose. There's a lot of conversation in my area over which is the best - if you have 10000 does, do you give 10000 first shots and assume you'll get the next batch within 3 weeks, or do you give 5000 doses now and save the other 5000 for the second shot for the first round of people?
Just wondering if you know how your area is handling it?
That’s how you chose to read it. What I said was I still had to work and do all the things I did before. My kids still go to daycare/school like before. Do I want to get it no. But I’m not afraid to get it bc I feel like it’s inevitable. I never said I was making choices bc I wasn’t afraid. Working isn’t a choice. Grocery shopping isn’t a choice. Neither is sending my kids to daycare. You read what you wanted to and made a judgment based on what you thought I said without knowing a thing about me.
thats just insane and to me illogical. The people who get the first dose need the second dose, its just not logical to exhaust the delivery to give everyone dose number one and then hope for the best that dose number two arrives in time.
Its because here we are getting rolling shipments. So there’s another shipment coming next week and the week after and the week after and capacity is ramped up over time. The point is to get the clock running with as many people as quickly as possible.
Just for simplicity say there was 10 doses available this week, 20 next week, 30 next, and 40 the fourth, 70 the fifth, 100 the sixth. If you held 50% of each shipment in 6 weeks you’d have 15 people fully vaccinated (10/2 + 20/2). By using supply as they receive it by week 6 you’ll have 30 people vaccinated (10+20). Apply that over thousands instead of tens and it makes a huge difference. The CDC, FDA, and Pfitter are carefully coordinating to ensure shipment in 4 weeks exceeds current delivery for each state and county.
Right - clearly *if* those shipments come in as expected than it's best to do as many as possible now. But there have been concerns voiced (including from our local dept of health) that you're running a risk of not getting those extra doses or of production not being able to ramp up as expected.
I'm honestly not sure what the right answer is - and I'm sure people far more knowledgeable about all of this have thought it all through - but there is a risk either way.
I remember polio very well. I was very young, but I remember seeing the pictures of people in iron lungs. It was very scary. One of my parents friends had polio. She did not have to be in an iron lung, but she lost the ability to walk for several years. My parents did not hesitate when the vaccine became available. We received our vaccination via an injection. Eventually, they started using sugar cubes. After seeing what life was like for many who contracted polio, getting the vaccination wasn't a difficult decision for my parents.Not sure how many here are old enough to remember the polio outbreak in the US back in the 50’s. (I’ve only read/studied about it during school). Eerily similar environment back then as what we are experiencing now with SARS-COV-2. People stayed indoors, minimized touching and interacting with others, wore masks and gloves.
Maybe some people were hesitant about new vaccines back then? But, the slight difference now is that we have a vaccine in less than a year. It took about 4 years to get a commercialized vaccine for Polio back in the 50’s. So, people were probably more willing to take whatever came out by the time one was made available. Jonas Salk (yes, that Salk Institute in San Diego) was the man credited for the vaccine that came out in 1955. By public pressure to quickly do something, the US gov licensed the vaccine manufacturing to a handful of labs. One of these was Cutter Laboratories. A bad initial batch from this company, and government’s efforts to hastily mass produce a new vaccine led to what is now known as the Cutter Incident. The vaccine contained infectious levels of live Polio virus. A couple hundred became paralyzed from Polio and about a dozen died. Obviously, federal regulations and safety protocols have improved drastically since. But, the environment is similar.
ETA: Vaccines are a very poor financial driver for companies. There’s no money to be had in this sector. Therapeutics is where the big bucks are made. Thus, before COVID-19 and Operation Warpspeed, there were only 3 major companies with names on vaccine vials. Now, everyone is in the race with money pouring in, and companies that had no name recognition are now even worth hundreds more than book value on the market. Besides MRNA stock, look at what has happened to CODX, and especially NVAX since the beginning of the year. $1 to $11, and <$4 to $170!! A $100 investment in NVAX could have gotten you about $5,600.
I remember polio very well. I was very young, but I remember seeing the pictures of people in iron lungs. It was very scary. One of my parents friends had polio. She did not have to be in an iron lung, but she lost the ability to walk for several years. My parents did not hesitate when the vaccine became available. We received our vaccination via an injection. Eventually, they started using sugar cubes. After seeing what life was like for many who contracted polio, getting the vaccination wasn't a difficult decision for my parents.
I was just about to ask that, if it is that one looks like they are advising she not get the second dose at this time.Was that the one in Alaska?
Was that the one in Alaska?
I heard that one recipient has a severe allergic reaction, but the monitoring caught it. At least the one I'm thinking of, the reporting was that this person didn't have any previous severe allergies.I don’t know. I follow the CDC on Twitter and they retweeted that they are aware of a severe reaction in a healthcare worker and they are helping to evaluate the case.
With smallpox vaccine starting in the late 1700's and polio in the early 1950's, there was no Internet to create and perpetuate all the many conspiracy theories that run amok on the Net. I recall getting my polio vaccination within a short period of time when it came out. 'Everybody' went to get it. Dr. Salk was a true national and worldwide hero.I wonder if people were so suspicious of the polio vaccine or smallpox vaccine when it came out?
https://time.com/3714090/salk-vaccine-historyI recall getting my polio vaccination within a short period of time when it came out. 'Everybody' went to get it. Dr. Salk was a true national and worldwide hero.
thats just insane and to me illogical. The people who get the first dose need the second dose, its just not logical to exhaust the delivery to give everyone dose number one and then hope for the best that dose number two arrives in time.