I've not been accused of child abuse before, thankfully.
If not familiar, something that might be of interest is the court case of Dr. Waney Squier from the UK. She has been described as a world renowned neuropathologist. She also does not believe in shaken baby syndrome. As imagined no tests have been done showing shaking a baby will cause shaken baby syndrome for ethical reasons.
The Dr. testified about her not believing in shaken baby syndrome in court. As a result she ran into trouble with the law.
There have been a few articles written what is happening. As can be imagined, this is highly controversial. People have gone to jail for the agreement that child abuse and death has occurred over shaken baby syndrome.
A couple articles on this:
http://thejusticegap.com/2016/05/silencing-dr-waney-squier/
snippet:
‘It is a sad day for science when a 21st-century inquisition denies one doctor the freedom to question ‘mainstream’ beliefs. It is a particularly sad day for the parent or carer who ends up on the wrong end of another doctor’s ‘diagnosis’ that an infant was shaken, when the child may have died from entirely different, natural causes.’
Clive Stafford Smith and Michael Mansfield QC
&
https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2016/10/20/saturated-fat-and-heart-disease/
excerpt:
...Dr Waney Squier does not believe that shaken baby syndrome exists. Of course she knows that the triad of subdural haematoma, retinal bleeding and brain swelling exists. But she believes there could be other explanations. Including, perish the very thought, an accidental fall.
Because she does not believe in shaken baby syndrome, she has presented evidence in court which has tended to undermine the prosecution case against parents and carers, accused of shaking a baby and causing severe brain damage. Much to the annoyance of the police and they then, for it was indeed them, reported Dr Squier to the GMC.
Now, I know what most of you are thinking. Surely ‘shaken baby syndrome’ exists. This must have been proven. Well, it has not. If you think about it, how could it be proven? How do you think a study on shaken baby syndrome could ever be done? Get five hundred children, shake them forcefully and see what happens to their brains. I suspect you might find gaining ethical approval for a such a study might be tricky.
Despite this, and the fact that shaken baby syndrome represents an ‘unproven hypothesis’ almost all experts around the world are convinced that shaken baby syndrome exists. Dr Squier, who seems a well-rounded and sensible lady, has made the terrible mistake of questioning that this dogma. There could be, shock horror, other possible causes.
The police objected, judges objected, her peers objected, and she has been struck off. No longer able to practice medicine anywhere in the world. She has become a medical pariah.
The good news is that her case in going in front of an actual court of law in the UK. I strongly suspect (maybe I just hope) that her ‘conviction’ will be overturned. She does have the support of a number of other paediatricians around the world. However, in the meantime, other doctors, who do not believe in shaken baby syndrome, will not dare go to court to testify in support of those accused of shaking babies. Such is the power of the Spanish Inquisition....
&
Why the shaken baby syndrome tribunal led to Dr Waney Squier being struck off
https://www.theguardian.com/society...bunal-led-to-dr-waney-squier-being-struck-off