Back in the day, under my stage name, my admittedly risqué act was Banned In Boston for being lewd, obscene, and having no redeeming social value.
I didn't mind. The resulting publicity ensured sold out crowds during the rest of my tour.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banned_in_Boston
Boston was founded by the Puritans in the early 17th century, who held strict moral standards. Boston's second major wave of immigrants,
Irish Catholics, began arriving in the 1820s and also held conservative moral beliefs, particularly regarding sex.
[2] The phrase "banned in Boston", however, originated in the late 19th century at a time when
American "moral crusader"
Anthony Comstock began a campaign to suppress vice.
[3] He found widespread support in Boston, particularly among socially-prominent and influential officials.
[2][3] Comstock was also known as the proponent of the
Comstock Act, which prevented "obscene" materials from being delivered by the
U.S. mail.
[4]
Following Comstock's lead, Boston's city officials took it upon themselves to ban anything that they found to be salacious, inappropriate, or offensive. Aiding them in their efforts was a group of private citizens, the Boston
Watch and Ward Society.
[2] Theatrical shows were run out of town, books were confiscated, and motion pictures were prevented from being shown; sometimes movies were stopped mid-showing, after an official had "seen enough". In 1935, for example, during the opening performance of
Clifford Odets' play
Waiting for Lefty four cast members were placed under arrest.
[2]
This movement had several unintended consequences. One was that Boston, a cultural center since its founding, was perceived as less sophisticated than many cities without stringent
censorship practices.
[2] Another was that the phrase "banned in Boston" became associated, in the popular mind, with something lurid, sexy, and naughty. Commercial distributors were often pleased when their works were banned in Boston—it gave them more appeal elsewhere.
[2]