Have yet to hear a concession speech!

jrydberg

<font color=navy>Was it Fudge or Not? <br><img src
Joined
Apr 19, 2004
Messages
4,486
Since I have yet to hear a concession speech, I must assume that the mastermind (I won't name names, but it begins with a c- and ends with a -ynsaun) behind the attempted Dunkin Donuts coup has resorted to legal action to throw out Krispy Kreme votes.

Let me just assure all the Krispy Kreme fans out there that we have retained Johnny Cochran to uphold our dominance of the breakfast treat market. As soon as he's done defending Saddam Hussein, he'll be on the case!

4 more years of Krispy Kreme!
 
Originally posted by jrydberg
4 more years of Krispy Kreme!

Jryberg- how exciting to find a platform that I can join you on and support (of course, if too many people on that platform eat too many doughnuts, it will probably break.;)

Nonetheless, 4 more years indeed!

(I support Krispy Kreme doughnuts, and I paid for this message.)
 

I'm not much for donuts, but with a choice I would prefer KK.
Just remember one thing... Krispy Kreme is a donut shop, Dunkin' Donuts is a coffee shop
 
I had already posted that I accidentally voted for KK when I meant to click on DD. And I'm not even from Florida! This was a very difficult voter system, so there were probably others who did the same thing. You know, as we get older, the eyesight diminishes and it's very hard to see which circle to click on :p. I think we should re-vamp the whole system. Or send it to the Supreme Court for them to decide:teeth:. Re-count, Re-count!
 
Our counsel, Jackie Chiles, has advised us not to respond to this obvious attempt to undermine the true winner of this race. His statement is below:

"After closely monitoring the results in several key states, we have found that there were many ballots with hanging sprinkles. We are contesting this race as unfair to the voters that clearly wanted Dunkin Donuts to win. Clearly, their votes were either blocked during polling, or smeared with the grease from those gross competitor doughnuts, Krispy Kreme. That's an infringement on their constitutional rights! That's totally inapproriate. It's deplorable, unfathomable, improbable!"
 
Originally posted by cynsaun
Our counsel, Jackie Chiles, has advised us not to respond to this obvious attempt to undermind the true winner of this race. His statement is below:

"After closely monitoring the results in several key states, we have found that there were many ballots with hanging sprinkles. We are contesting this race as unfair to the voters that clearly wanted Dunkin Donuts to win. Clearly, their votes were either blocked during polling, or smeared with the grease from those gross competitor doughnuts, Krispy Kreme. That's an infringement on their constitutional rights! That's totally inapproriate. It's deplorable, unfathomable, improbable!"

After careful research, the judge in this case, the honorable Art Vandalay, determined that there were not, in fact, any pregnant or dimpled doughnuts. They were, rather, creme-filled.

Judge Vandalay has yet to rule on the so-called "hanging sprinkles," but Krispy Kreme attorney Johnny Cochran has been quoted as saying, "mmmhpphhhmmmm -- err... sorry, was just finishing up a kruller."
 
Krispy Kremes have a plan! Also, they do not own a lumber company. You can read about it on the internets! :teeth:
 
Fromwhat I understand a third party has joined the frey, The third party "Atkins South Beach" have turned voters away from the high carb contenders and have sent them to the Vegetarian Party.
 
Originally posted by jrydberg
After careful research, the judge in this case, the honorable Art Vandalay, determined that there were not, in fact, any pregnant or dimpled doughnuts. They were, rather, creme-filled.

Judge Vandalay has yet to rule on the so-called "hanging sprinkles," but Krispy Kreme attorney Johnny Cochran has been quoted as saying, "mmmhpphhhmmmm -- err... sorry, was just finishing up a kruller."



We move for a mistrial in this case. It has become apparent that Judge Vandalay has struck an under-the-table deal with the defense, wherein Krispy Kreme offered Judge Vandalay free lattes for life. This is dispicable, deplorable, intolerable!!!
 
Originally posted by cynsaun
We move for a mistrial in this case. It has become apparent that Judge Vandalay has struck an under-the-table deal with the defense, wherein Krispy Kreme offered Judge Vandalay free lattes for life. This is dispicable, deplorable, intolerable!!!

Clearly Dunkin Donuts has no case. Anyone who did the research would know that Judge Vandalay has a weak spot for raspberry-filled do-- err... I mean, Judge Vandalay is a fine, upstanding judge who has served with honor and -- excuse me one second. Yes, that's 2 dozen a week. Directly to his chambers, yes. -- Where was I?
 
Originally posted by jrydberg
Clearly Dunkin Donuts has no case. Anyone who did the research would know that Judge Vandalay has a weak spot for raspberry-filled do-- err... I mean, Judge Vandalay is a fine, upstanding judge who has served with honor and -- excuse me one second. Yes, that's 2 dozen a week. Directly to his chambers, yes. -- Where was I?

Further statement from Jackie Chiles:

It is clear that Krispy Kreme must resort to bribery to win this case. We also have proof that the defendant was also bribing voters on their way to the polls. We found glaze on every ballot cast for Krispy Kreme. My fellow Americans this is an injustice!
I therefore demand that Krispy Kreme cease this ridiculous charge that they have the better donut! It is clear to everyone that the light and fluffy texture of the Dunkin Donut is far superior to that of the heavy, greasy Krispy Kreme. There are "doughnut" holes in their claims!! It is deplorable, detestable, disgusting-able, cheating-able, and underhanded-able!!
 
Originally posted by jrydberg
Since I have yet to hear a concession speech, I must assume that the mastermind (I won't name names, but it begins with a c- and ends with a -ynsaun) behind the attempted Dunkin Donuts coup has resorted to legal action to throw out Krispy Kreme votes.

Let me just assure all the Krispy Kreme fans out there that we have retained Johnny Cochran to uphold our dominance of the breakfast treat market. As soon as he's done defending Saddam Hussein, he'll be on the case!

4 more years of Krispy Kreme!

Hear, hear. More Krispy Kreme! Although in the interest of full disclosure, I have to admit I am a stockholder in Krispy Kreme.

The experts say you should invest in what you know, and I know donuts!
 
Originally posted by cynsaun
There are "doughnut" holes in their claims!!

The only doughtnut holes to be found are in the Dunkin Donuts camp! The glaze allegedly found on the ballots does not match the formula Krispy Kreme uses!

If the glaze does not fit, you must acquit!
 
Originally posted by jrydberg
The only doughtnut holes to be found are in the Dunkin Donuts camp! The glaze allegedly found on the ballots does not match the formula Krispy Kreme uses!

If the glaze does not fit, you must acquit!

Don't believe it for a second! The recipe for our secret glaze was stolen from the armoire we kept it locked in. We had some crazed woman with black curly hair come into our store and start reading off our secret doughnut recipes. Clearly she was part of this smear campaign!

It was a set up!!!
 
No doughtnut for you! Come back, one year! NEXT!
 


Disney Vacation Planning. Free. Done for You.
Our Authorized Disney Vacation Planners are here to provide personalized, expert advice, answer every question, and uncover the best discounts. Let Dreams Unlimited Travel take care of all the details, so you can sit back, relax, and enjoy a stress-free vacation.
Start Your Disney Vacation
Disney EarMarked Producer






DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest DIS Tiktok DIS Twitter

Add as a preferred source on Google

Back
Top Bottom